Zoho Projects
CE 87 free tierTeams already inside the Zoho suite, or anyone hunting one of the cheapest per-seat ways in.
From a free kanban board to a flat fee that covers a whole company, 20 project management tools sit on one price axis, each figure taken straight from the vendor's page. The number most people miss is the free tier. 18 tools run one, and every one of them stops somewhere you grow into.
18 of these 20 project management tools run a free tier, which makes where free ends the question that matters. Paid seats open at $5 and the median lands at $10, checked August 8, 2026. Smartsheet is the lone holdout that bills from day one.
Scoring is sixty percent pricing transparency and forty percent verified user rating. Capability stays out of the number: what each tool can do lives in the grid, not the score. See how we score.
Read left to right: whether a tool has a free tier, whether it prints a price for every plan, then the six capabilities that actually split this market. Sprints, dependencies, goals, time tracking, resourcing and guest access. On the price axis a tick marks a per-seat plan and a diamond marks a flat fee that does not move with headcount.
Reading the console
Each row is one tool, sorted by how transparently it prices. The price axis plots each tool's monthly seat price. A tick marks a per-seat plan, where the bill grows with the team. A diamond marks a flat fee that covers a whole account regardless of headcount, the way Basecamp and Nifty's team plans do. A capability cell shows only what the record confirms, so a blank is missing evidence, not a missing feature. Two things the axis leaves out: where a free plan gives way, and the AI credits several vendors charge alongside a seat.
Scroll the console sideways to reach the remaining conditions.
The shortlist ranks by what the plan actually costs your team, not by list price. Flat plans are folded into a per-team number so they compare like for like. Only vendors rated 85 and up are eligible.
For 6 seats at $10 per seat, start with these
Ranked by monthly team cost, vendors rated 85 and up · Your ceiling for this team: $60 / mo
Zoho Projects
CE 87 free tierTeams already inside the Zoho suite, or anyone hunting one of the cheapest per-seat ways in.
Trello
CE 89 free tierSmall teams that want a kanban board and nothing heavier.
Todoist
CE 91 free tierIndividuals and small teams tracking tasks, not running complex projects.
Open a row for a tool's full set of plans, each price stamped with the date we checked it. Ranking follows the transparency score, not price or headcount.
Transparency scorePricing transparency 60%User satisfaction 40%
Individuals and small teams tracking tasks, not running complex projects. Todoist prints a price for every plan with no hidden enterprise step, and its free tier keeps basic task reminders; the custom, unlimited kind arrive with Pro.
Critical gapThe platform misses complex dependency tracking for enterprise workflows.
Todoist: expert take
Solo users and small teams get the cleanest deal: every plan is priced on the page with no hidden enterprise step. Free covers the basics, task reminders included; custom and unlimited reminders wait behind Pro. A to-do app, not team project management.
Where Todoist holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 826 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2007Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner | Free | Free |
| Pro | $7 | $5 |
| Business | $10 | $8 |
Small teams that want a kanban board and nothing heavier. Trello's free plan gives 10 boards with Butler automation already switched on, and its Enterprise tier only makes sense at the 50-user floor it prices for.
Critical gapThe interface architecture limits effective project management for teams exceeding 12 concurrent users.
Trello: expert take
Small teams get more free than they expect: 10 boards with Butler automation already on. Past that, Trello stays a kanban board with no native Gantt or dependencies. Enterprise only prices sensibly at 50 users.
Where Trello holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 13,985 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2011Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| FREE | Free | Free |
| STANDARD | $6 | $5 |
| PREMIUM | $12.50 | $10 |
| ENTERPRISE | Not published | $17.50 |
Teams already inside the Zoho suite, or anyone hunting one of the cheapest per-seat ways in. Zoho Projects opens near the bottom of the range, though its storefront prices in euros with local tax added on top.
Critical gapThe cloud-only architecture requires constant internet connectivity, failing to support offline workflows.
Zoho Projects: expert take
Zoho-native teams get one of the cheapest per-seat entries in the category. The storefront prices in euros, and local tax lands on top of the sticker.
Where Zoho Projects holds up
4.4CE scoreG2 4.3 · 524 reviewsCapterra 4.4Founded 1996Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Premium | $5 | $4 |
| Enterprise | $10 | $9 |
| Ultimate | $14 | $14 |
Small teams choosing between paying per seat and paying flat, because Nifty lists both on one page. A $7 Personal seat sits beside a $39 Starter plan that covers a team of ten, so past a few seats the flat route wins.
Critical gapThe interface lacks refined design standards and consistent typography across the task dashboard.
Nifty: expert take
Nifty prices aggressively: annual terms run up to 45 percent below monthly, and the free plan is tight at two active projects and 100 MB. A capable milestones-and-docs tracker for small teams, lighter on reporting.
Where Nifty holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 442 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2017Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Personal | $7 | Not published |
| Business (per-seat) | $16 | Not published |
| Starter | $39 | Not published |
| Business (team) | $124 | Not published |
| Unlimited | $399 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Whole companies that want calm and one bill instead of per-seat maths. Basecamp bundles messaging, to-dos and client access, and guests never count toward the price.
Critical gapThe platform lacks the workflow customization necessary for agile-focused development.
Basecamp: expert take
Basecamp flips per-seat: its flat $299 Pro Unlimited comes with guests free, so it beats per-seat rivals only once a team passes roughly twenty. Below that it is dearer, not cheaper.
Where Basecamp holds up
4.2CE scoreG2 4.1 · 5,466 reviewsCapterra 4.3Founded 2004Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Pro | $15 | Not published |
| Pro Unlimited | $299 | Not published |
Teams after a colourful board they can shape without an admin. monday.com moves a non-technical team fast, but every paid plan carries a 3-seat minimum, so two people still pay for three.
Critical gapThe interface suffers from significant navigation latency when managing high volumes of concurrent boards.
monday.com: expert take
Every paid plan carries a 3-seat minimum, so a duo still pays for three. monday.com sells speed and colour to non-technical teams, but automations and integrations stay off the lower tiers.
Where monday.com holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 15,181 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2012Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Basic | $10.98 | $9 |
| Standard | $14.63 | $12 |
| Pro | $23.17 | $19 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that map work on a whiteboard before it reaches a tracker. Miro's free plan gives 3 editable boards, Prototypes stays a paid add-on even on paid plans, and Enterprise starts at 30 members.
Critical gapThe platform lacks the data hierarchy needed for complex roadmapping.
Miro: expert take
The free plan gives just 3 editable boards, and Prototypes stays a paid add-on even on paid tiers. Miro is a whiteboard first; Enterprise starts at 30 members. Large boards can lag.
Where Miro holds up
4.9CE scoreG2 4.8 · 12,949 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2011Verified August 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Starter | $10 | $8 |
| Business | $25 | $20 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that want docs, wikis and tasks in one surface rather than a dedicated tracker. Notion's free plan is unlimited for one person but throttles collaborative blocks once a second editor joins, and its AI runs on a separate credit meter.
Critical gapThe platform requires significant initial configuration time to develop functional database schemas.
Notion: expert take
The free plan looks unlimited until a second editor arrives, then collaborative blocks throttle. Notion also meters its AI on a credit currency separate from the seat price. Powerful as a workspace, slow once databases grow heavy.
Where Notion holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 11,845 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2016Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Plus | $12 | $10 |
| Business | $24 | $20 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that would rather configure one tool to do everything than run three apps. ClickUp carries the widest feature set here, but file storage is the first ceiling on its free plan, and AI is sold as add-on tiers rather than built into the price.
Critical gapThe platform exhibits high latency during complex task rendering and requires significant initial setup.
ClickUp: expert take
Teams chasing one tool for everything get the widest feature set here, but pay twice: the free plan hits a file-storage ceiling early, and AI is sold as add-on tiers, not included.
Where ClickUp holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 12,357 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2017Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Forever | Free | Free |
| Unlimited | $10 | $7 |
| Business | $19 | $12 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
| Brain AI | $14 | $9 |
| Everything AI | $33 | $28 |
Product and engineering teams that want fast, keyboard-first issue tracking. Linear runs on cycles and lists its paid plans on annual billing, and its coding-agent sessions draw on a separate AI credit pool. Non-engineering teams find it tight.
Critical gapThe platform architecture prevents effective management of multi-client service projects for external software consulting firms.
Linear: expert take
Built for engineers, tight for anyone else. Linear lists paid plans annually and runs its coding-agent sessions on a separate AI credit pool. Product teams get a fast, keyboard-first tracker; marketing and HR find it narrow.
Where Linear holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 86 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2019Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Basic | $10 | Not published |
| Business | $16 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that need a flexible database behind their projects, not just a task board. Airtable's free base stops at 1,000 records, and Portals for guest access is a paid add-on on every plan, including the paid ones.
Critical gapThe platform lacks inter-workspace logic for connecting complex data silos.
Airtable: expert take
Two limits bite quietly: the free base stops at 1,000 records, and Portals for guest access is a paid add-on on every plan. Airtable is a flexible relational database that slows as volume and complexity grow.
Where Airtable holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 3,255 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2012Verified August 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Team | $24 | $20 |
| Business | $54 | $45 |
| Enterprise Scale | Contact sales | |
Teams building their own tool out of docs, tables and formulas. Coda bills only Doc Makers, so a 30-person team with five makers pays for five, and editors and viewers stay free.
Coda: expert take
Coda rewards teams that build rather than view. Its AI runs on credits pooled per workspace, sized only as some, more or most, with extra packs sold per maker. Formula depth is real; the learning curve is steep.
Where Coda holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 492 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2014Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Pro | $12 | $10 |
| Team | $36 | $30 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that want time tracking, proofing and resourcing at a mid-market price. Hive packs a broad toolset, though its Starter plan caps a workspace at 10 members before you move up a tier.
Critical gapThe mobile application exhibits inconsistent performance and frequent software bugs.
Hive: expert take
The headline hides the stack: Hive layers eight optional add-on modules onto Teams, each an extra per-user charge, so a full set can rival the base plan itself. Starter also caps a workspace at 10 members.
Where Hive holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 663 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2015Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Starter | $7.50 | $5 |
| Teams | $18 | $12 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Mid-sized teams past a simple task list that coordinate work across departments. Asana leans on timelines and workflow rules, though Goals and Portfolios are locked to the Advanced tier and seats are added in fixed packs above the minimum.
Critical gapThe interface struggles with high-volume data management.
Asana: expert take
Buried in the seat maths: above the minimum, Asana adds seats in fixed packs, so you pay for empty chairs. Goals and Portfolios stay locked to the Advanced tier. Strong on timelines, thin on native time tracking.
Where Asana holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 13,714 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2008Verified August 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Personal | Free | Free |
| Starter | $13.49 | $10.99 |
| Advanced | $30.49 | $24.99 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Software teams that live in sprints, backlogs and issue tracking. Jira rations automation by tier, 100 runs a month on Free and 1,700 on Standard, and SSO with SCIM is a separate Atlassian Guard subscription on top.
Critical gapThe platform necessitates dedicated administrative resources to manage complex custom workflows and prevent configuration bloat.
Jira: expert take
Automation is rationed by tier, 100 runs a month free and 1,700 on Standard, and SSO with SCIM is a separate Atlassian Guard bill. Jira runs deep for engineers and overwhelms everyone else.
Where Jira holds up
4.4CE scoreG2 4.3 · 963 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2002Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Standard | $7.91 | Not published |
| Premium | $14.54 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Software teams that want issue tracking with far less overhead than Jira. Shortcut's free plan runs up to 10 active users; the full integration catalog opens at the Team tier.
Critical gapThe platform experiences functional utility degradation when managing complex dependency mapping at scale.
Shortcut: expert take
Dev and QA teams are the audience: Shortcut tracks work from sub-task to milestone with tight Git integration. The free plan runs up to 10 active users and carries the core integrations, GitHub, Slack and Figma; the full set opens at Team.
Where Shortcut holds up
4.4CE scoreG2 4.3 · 350 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2016Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Free | Free |
| Team Plan | $10 | $8.50 |
| Business Plan | $16 | $12 |
| Enterprise Plan | Contact sales | |
Client-services agencies that bill by the hour and need time tracking built in. Teamwork gives every paid plan free, unlimited client users, so bringing clients into a project does not raise the seat count.
Critical gapThe interface design requires significant navigation effort, creating a steep learning curve for new users.
Teamwork: expert take
Agencies that bill by the hour win most here: client users are free and unlimited on every paid plan, so bringing clients in never raises the seat count. The bundled Teamwork AI is an intro that later moves to credits.
Where Teamwork holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 1,391 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2007Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Basics | $9.99 | $9.99 |
| Accelerate | $24.99 | $24.99 |
| Optimize | Contact sales | |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Marketing and services teams that need proofing, request forms and resourcing in one place. Wrike publishes its Team and Business plans on annual billing only, so there is no month-to-month way to start.
Critical gapThe platform lacks native logic to automate the conversion of meeting discussions into actionable task tickets.
Wrike: expert take
The catch is billing cadence: Team and Business list on annual terms only, so there is no month-to-month way in. Wrike carries proofing and resourcing for services teams, and its own price list reserves the right to change packaging and pricing at any time.
Where Wrike holds up
4.3CE scoreG2 4.2 · 4,527 reviewsCapterra 4.3Founded 2006Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Team | Not published | $10 |
| Business | Not published | $25 |
| Pinnacle | Contact sales | |
| Apex | Contact sales | |
Operations and PMO teams that think in spreadsheets and manage work at scale. Smartsheet is a grid first and a project tool second, and it is the one tool here with no free tier, only a 30-day trial.
Critical gapThe platform requires dedicated administrative oversight to maintain complex permission structures.
Smartsheet: expert take
The spreadsheet crowd is the fit: Smartsheet manages work at scale in a grid, but it is the one tool here that never goes free, only a 30-day trial. Less-active teams pay per seat for capacity they underuse.
Where Smartsheet holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 22,023 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2005Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | $12 | $9 |
| Business | $24 | $19 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
| Advanced Work Management | Contact sales | |
A record of a tool that has closed, not a live option. Height has shut down, and the plans shown here are historical, kept for reference rather than as something you can still sign up for.
Critical gapThe platform requires significant manual configuration for complex multi-departmental workflows.
Height: expert take
Height has shut down. The plans recorded here are historical, kept for reference rather than as a live option, and it scores zero on this page. If you are comparing, treat it as closed and choose a supported tracker instead.
Where Height holds up
4.9CE scoreG2 4.8 · 75 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2019Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Team | $8.50 | $6.99 |
| Business | $14.99 | $11.99 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
What the records say
Trello starts cheaper: $6 / seat against $7 from Todoist, $1 apart at the door.
For 6 seats, Trello bills $36 / mo and Todoist bills $42 / mo, $6 / mo between them.
Both carry 1 of the 6 capability columns on the record.
Users side with Todoist: 4.5 on G2 against 4.4 for Trello.
Both run a free tier, so either can be tried before the bill starts.
Both publish every tier they sell.
Pick Todoist for: Individuals and small teams tracking tasks, not running complex projects.
Pick Trello for: Small teams that want a kanban board and nothing heavier.
Todoist
CE 91 · G2 4.5Verified July 8, 2026
Trello
CE 89 · G2 4.4Verified July 8, 2026
Both price lists on the category axis
Where they differ
Only Todoist has on the record
Only Trello has on the record
The word free hides a dozen different ceilings. Trello measures it in boards, Miro in editable canvases, monday.com and Shortcut in users, Jira in monthly automation runs, and Todoist in a withheld feature. Notion is unlimited for one person and tightens the moment a colleague joins. None of these is a trick. A free plan is a working trial for a real team, and the honest question is not whether it is free but which limit you reach first.
The second thing the free tier hides is AI. Notion, ClickUp, Airtable, Miro and Coda now run a separate credit meter for it, billed on top of the seat price and easy to miss on the pricing page. If AI sits in the middle of your workflow, price that meter on its own, because it is the line item most likely to move the total after you have already chosen the tool.
Per-seat looks simple until the fine print sets in. monday.com will not sell fewer than 3 seats. Asana adds seats in fixed packs, so you buy capacity you may not use. Wrike and Linear list their team plans on annual billing only, which locks the spend a year at a time. Miro and Trello reserve their steepest seat floors, 30 and 50 users, for Enterprise. Each of these turns a tidy headline number into a larger real one.
A few tools break the pattern the other way. Basecamp charges one flat fee that ignores headcount and comes out ahead once a team passes roughly twenty. Nifty prints both a per-seat plan and a flat team plan on the same page. Coda bills only the people who build docs, so a large team with a handful of makers pays for the makers alone. When per-seat maths starts to hurt, a flat model is often the cheaper answer.
Free tiers built this category, and free tiers end it: the moment you need guests, automations or admin controls, you are on a paid tier. Compare paid seats at your real team size, and read the per-seat fine print for minimums before the trial runs out.
The score follows published prices. Tools that price every rung in the open rank above suites that route growth through a quote.
Still weighing it? Answer 5 questions, take a shortlist.
How this review is made. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked on the dates shown against each product. Condition columns reflect the feature set recorded on the vendor’s own pages on that date. ComparEdge sells no project management tools and takes no vendor payment for placement. Where a vendor publishes nothing, this page says so rather than estimating. Ranking is by transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. What a product can do is shown in the condition columns and carries no weight in the number.