Buttondown
CE 94 free tierWriters and developers after a Markdown-native newsletter with nothing bolted on by default.
From a free list of a few thousand to enterprise deals quoted on request, here are the published plans for 20 email marketing platforms in 2026. Most bill by contact count and a few by send volume, so the entry price marks a floor set at the smallest list a vendor will sell you.
Free plans exist on 13 of the 20 platforms, and the first paid tier costs $7 monthly, verified July 29, 2026. Almost all price by the size of your list, so that opening figure is quoted at the smallest audience a vendor sells and rises as your contacts do. The median entry sits near $14.
Ranked by a transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. Capability is not scored. It is the condition grid below. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked per product on the dates shown. ComparEdge sells no email marketing platform and takes no payment for placement. How the score is built.
Each figure is an entry band, quoted at the smallest list or send volume the vendor sells. It moves in one direction as your audience fills out.
Reading the console
Vendors sit in order of transparency score, meaning how much of the pricing each one publishes, weighed against user ratings. The scale is logarithmic. A small step to the right can mean a large jump in dollars. Every price is an entry band at the smallest list or send volume a vendor sells, and it rises as that volume grows. The condition columns run in order: ecommerce integration, landing pages, transactional and SMTP sending, SMS, and push. A blank column marks a gap in the record we hold, not something the platform cannot do.
Scroll the console sideways to reach the remaining conditions.
The shortlist ranks by what the plan actually costs your team, not by list price. Flat plans are folded into a per-team number so they compare like for like. Only vendors rated 85 and up are eligible.
For a team of 6 under $14 / mo, start with these
Ranked by monthly team cost, vendors rated 85 and up
Buttondown
CE 94 free tierWriters and developers after a Markdown-native newsletter with nothing bolted on by default.
Omnisend
CE 93 free tierShopify and ecommerce stores that want email, SMS, and push inside one automation flow at a low entry.
Mailchimp
CE 89 free tierThe small business that wants email, landing pages, and ads under a single login, willing to pay more for a name it recognizes.
Every row unfolds the vendor's complete plan list and shows the date of our last check. Rows are ordered by disclosure, not by cost or brand size.
Transparency scorePricing transparency 60%User satisfaction 40%
The creator selling digital products, not the marketer running broadcast blasts. Kit carries the highest free ceiling in the category and takes a commerce cut per sale once you start selling, so its revenue rides on your storefront rather than a seat count.
Critical gapThe native landing page builder restricts complex design customization.
Kit: expert take
Kit, once ConvertKit, raised its free ceiling to the highest in the category and leaned into selling. The catch arrives with commerce: a cut on each digital sale sits on top of the subscriber tier, a second till most creators miss.
Where Kit holds up
4.8CE scoreCapterra 4.7Founded 2013Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Newsletter | Free | Free |
| Creator | $33 | $32.50 |
| Pro | $66 | $65.83 |
Writers and developers after a Markdown-native newsletter with nothing bolted on by default. Buttondown starts at zero and sells each capability, segmentation and automations among them, as an add-on, so a plain letter stays cheap and a loaded one adds up.
Critical gapThe platform lacks native support for complex CSS or custom HTML template injections.
Buttondown: expert take
Buttondown's a la carte model is the trap: segmentation and automations are add-ons that stack on the base, so a loaded newsletter adds up while a plain one stays near zero. Markdown-native and lean, it rewards writers who want nothing bolted on.
Where Buttondown holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 1 reviewsCapterra 4.8Founded 2017Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| First 100 | Free | Free |
| ~1,000 | $9 | $7.50 |
| ~5,000 | $29 | $24.17 |
Shopify and ecommerce stores that want email, SMS, and push inside one automation flow at a low entry. Omnisend prices by contacts and sizes its email allowance at roughly a dozen sends per contact each cycle, then meters SMS separately on top.
Critical gapThe platform experiences interface latency when processing high-volume, complex customer segmentation data.
Omnisend: expert take
Omnisend sizes its email allowance at roughly a dozen sends per contact each cycle, a cap heavy senders can hit, and meters SMS separately on top. Built for retail, it lands email, SMS and push in one automation flow at a low contact-priced entry.
Where Omnisend holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 1,185 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2014Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Standard | $11.20 | Not published |
| Pro | $41.30 | Not published |
Teams that want deep automation wired into a built-in CRM and will commit to annual billing to see the lowest number. The advertised price is the yearly rate; month to month is quieter, and the Starter tier caps you at one user and a fixed send allowance.
Critical gapThe platform experiences significant performance latency when managing databases exceeding 10,000 active contacts.
ActiveCampaign: expert take
The advertised price is annual; month-to-month is quieter and higher, and the Starter tier boxes you into one user and a fixed send cap. What you get for the commitment is automation depth wired into a real CRM, not a bolt-on.
Where ActiveCampaign holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 14,682 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2003Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | Not published | $15 |
| Plus | Not published | $49 |
| Pro | Not published | $79 |
| Enterprise | Not published | $145 |
The small business that wants email, landing pages, and ads under a single login, willing to pay more for a name it recognizes. Its intro promo halves the first stretch, then the rate resets upward, and unsubscribed contacts keep counting toward your band until you archive them by hand.
Critical gapComplex automation workflows frequently lack technical reliability for scaling operations.
Mailchimp: expert take
Mailchimp has raised rates repeatedly and pared back the free tier over successive cycles. The intro promo halves the first stretch, then resets to full price, and it keeps billing unsubscribed contacts until you archive them by hand. Familiar, and rarely the cheapest.
Where Mailchimp holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 12,920 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2001Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Essentials | $13 | Not published |
| Standard | $20 | Not published |
| Premium | $350 | Not published |
The store that wants one plan and no tier-shopping, not the buyer who likes choosing a package. Drip sells a single subscription whose price follows the number of people you track and the volume you send, with unlimited emails inside that.
Critical gapThe platform lacks granular parameter control for complex email sequence customization.
Drip: expert take
Drip hides a second axis inside one flat-looking plan: price tracks both the people you follow and the volume you send, so one simple price is really two dials. In return you get behavior-triggered automation and unlimited sends on a single tier.
Where Drip holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 474 reviewsCapterra 4.4Founded 2013Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Drip | $39 | Not published |
Solo operators who value deliverability and a dependable free tier over the newest builder. AWeber prices in subscriber bands and shrinks its commerce fee at higher tiers, so heavier sellers recover the upgrade through a smaller cut on every sale.
Critical gapThe interface complicates management of multiple subscriber lists, requiring manual tagging to maintain organizational data structure.
AWeber: expert take
AWeber's ceiling is age: the feature set trails the newer builders. What holds up is deliverability, a genuine free tier, and a commerce fee that shrinks as you move up bands, so heavier sellers claw back the upgrade through a smaller cut.
Where AWeber holds up
4.3CE scoreG2 4.2 · 649 reviewsCapterra 4.4Founded 1998Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Lite | $15 | $12.50 |
| Plus | $30 | $20 |
| Done For You | $30 | $20 |
The SaaS team wiring product, transactional, and marketing email into app events, not the newsletter writer. Loops keeps a rare flat shape with no per-seat or per-send charge on its paid plans and includes transactional sends rather than metering them apart.
Critical gapThe platform lacks deep native CRM synchronization for complex data.
Loops: expert take
Loops keeps a rare flat shape: no per-seat or per-send charge on its paid plans, with transactional email included rather than metered apart. The limit is focus. It is built for SaaS product and lifecycle mail, not the newsletter writer.
Where Loops holds up
4.9CE scoreG2 4.8 · 41 reviewsCapterra 4.8Founded 2022Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Starter | $49 | Not published |
| Growth | $99 | Not published |
| Pro | $199 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Creatives who want templates that look designed and a bill that ignores dead weight, not the marketer who lives in automation. Flodesk counts only active subscribers, so unsubscribes never cost you, and it retired its old flat unlimited plan for new signups.
Critical gapThe platform lacks granular reporting and deep CRM integration.
Flodesk: expert take
Flodesk closed its old flat unlimited plan to new signups and moved to tiered pricing. Its standout remains the meter: it counts only active subscribers, so unsubscribes never cost you. The free tier builds forms but cannot send. Design-first, light on automation.
Where Flodesk holds up
4.1CE scoreG2 4 · 255 reviewsCapterra 4.2Founded 2019Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Lite | $25 | $19 |
| Pro | $28 | $25 |
| Everything | $54 | $49 |
Growing creators who want a clean builder, a proper free tier, and one of the lower paid entries here. MailerLite folds in websites and digital-product selling, though its round-the-clock support and a dedicated IP come with conditions the free plan drops after two weeks.
Critical gapComplex, high-volume automation workflows encounter functional scaling constraints within the platform.
MailerLite: expert take
MailerLite's free plan looks generous until the fine print: round-the-clock support and a dedicated IP carry conditions the free tier drops after two weeks. Past that, it is one of the cheaper clean builders here, with websites and digital-product selling folded in.
Where MailerLite holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 1,107 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2010Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Comfort | $12 | $10.80 |
| Power | $25 | $22.50 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
The publisher who treats the list as a business, not the hobbyist mailing a few friends. beehiiv builds in an ad network, referrals, and paid subscriptions, sends unlimited email on every tier, and caps its Scale and Max plans at a hundred thousand subscribers.
Critical gapThe platform lacks native organic growth tools for acquiring new subscribers.
beehiiv: expert take
beehiiv's Scale and Max plans cap out at a hundred thousand subscribers, so the largest lists hit a ceiling. The draw is monetization built in: an ad network, referrals and paid subscriptions, with unlimited sends on every tier so you pay for the list, not the volume.
Where beehiiv holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 40 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2021Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | Free | Free |
| Scale | $49 | $43 |
| Max | $109 | $96 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
The sender with a large but quiet list, not the brand hoarding contacts it never mails. Brevo bills by the volume you send rather than the people you store, so an unlimited contact list stays cheap and the meter only moves when you hit send.
Critical gapAggressive automated account suspension flags legitimate third-party database imports.
Brevo: expert take
Brevo's oddity is its meter: it bills by emails sent, not contacts stored, so a big dormant list stays cheap and heavy senders pay. Removing its badge is a separate monthly charge on Starter, and the CRM is a distinct paid product.
Where Brevo holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 2,561 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2012Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Starter | $9 | $8.08 |
| Standard | $18 | $16.17 |
| Professional | $499 | $449.08 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Ecommerce brands on Shopify running revenue-attributed email and SMS off store data. Klaviyo meters two things at once, active profiles for email and a separate credit pool for texts, so a tightly segmented list is cheaper than a bloated one of the same size.
Critical gapThe interface complicates image library management and bulk list cleaning operations.
Klaviyo: expert take
Klaviyo runs two meters at once, active profiles for email and a separate SMS credit pool, so an unsegmented list quietly inflates the bill; an active profile is not the same as a subscriber. The payoff is store-data segmentation few rivals match.
Where Klaviyo holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 1,349 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2012Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| $20 | Not published | |
| Email & SMS | $35 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
The cost-sensitive sender who wants a roomy free tier, not the buyer chasing brand cachet. Sender pairs email and SMS at one of the lowest paid entries here, with two caveats: texting is priced by destination country and the headline excludes VAT.
Critical gapReported latency in message dispatching and inconsistent email deliverability rates.
Sender: expert take
Sender's headline hides two things: prices exclude VAT, which adds a fifth or more in some countries, and SMS is priced by destination country. Look past that and it pairs email and SMS at one of the lowest paid entries here, on a roomy free tier.
Where Sender holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 246 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2012Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Forever | Free | Free |
| Standard | $7 | Not published |
| Professional | $14 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Brand and agency teams that care most about template control and design polish. Campaign Monitor prices in contact bands but sells some Essentials features, like click segmentation and countdown timers, as one-off purchases rather than folding them in.
Critical gapWeekend support is unavailable for lower-tier service plans.
Campaign Monitor: expert take
Campaign Monitor sells some Essentials features, like click segmentation and countdown timers, as one-off purchases rather than including them, so the plan price understates a loaded setup. What you are really buying is template control and design polish, priced in contact bands.
Where Campaign Monitor holds up
4.2CE scoreG2 4.1 · 721 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2004Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not published |
| Lite | $13 | $11.70 |
| Essentials | $31 | $27.90 |
| Premier | $171 | $153.90 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Development shops after an email API and SMTP relay with shared template editing. Mailjet prices by the volume you send rather than the contacts you keep, and stays inside EU data rules, which suits teams sending transactional mail out of Europe.
Critical gapUsers report inconsistent support responsiveness and occasional integration reliability issues.
Mailjet: expert take
Mailjet meters on send volume, not stored contacts, so a large list you rarely mail stays cheap. Its free tier throttles to a daily send cap. The pitch is a developer-friendly API and SMTP relay inside EU data rules, with shared template editing.
Where Mailjet holds up
4.1CE scoreG2 4 · 173 reviewsCapterra 4.3Founded 2010Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Starter | $9 | Not published |
| Essential | $17 | Not published |
| Premium | $27 | Not published |
| Custom | Contact sales | |
Marketers who want webinars and funnels bundled with the email tool rather than bought separately. GetResponse keeps a standing free plan off to one side and prices its paid tiers across eight list-size bands, with a discount and a free domain on annual billing.
Critical gapThe email editor interface exhibits documented UI performance inconsistencies.
GetResponse: expert take
GetResponse spreads its paid pricing across eight list-size bands, so the jump between tiers is easy to miss. Its Free Forever plan sits outside the ranked axis. The reason to pay more is bundled webinars and funnels, not a bigger send limit.
Where GetResponse holds up
4.3CE scoreG2 4.2 · 1,120 reviewsCapterra 4.2Founded 1998Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Forever Plan | $0 | Not published |
| Starter | $19 | $15 |
| Marketer | $59 | $48 |
| Creator | $69 | $56 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
The small business or nonprofit that wants a person on the phone, not the lowest line item. Constant Contact charges by contacts and by sends together, adds overage fees when you pass the band, and reserves a bundled text allowance for its upper tier.
Critical gapThe platform suffers from recurring system downtime and restrictive template design parameters that hinder unique brand identity.
Constant Contact: expert take
Constant Contact bills on contacts and sends together and adds overage fees past the band, so the meter runs two ways at once. There is no standing free tier, and bundled texting is reserved for the top plan. You pay for phone support and event tools.
Where Constant Contact holds up
4.1CE scoreG2 4 · 7,388 reviewsCapterra 4.3Founded 1995Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Lite | $12 | Not published |
| Standard | $35 | Not published |
| Premium | $80 | Not published |
| Teams | Contact sales | |
Engineering teams sending transactional and marketing email at scale through one API and SMTP relay. SendGrid, owned by Twilio, meters two axes together, the contacts you store and the emails you send, and warns that taxes and overages can land on top.
Critical gapThe mandatory compliance review process causes significant initial deployment latency.
Twilio SendGrid: expert take
SendGrid, owned by Twilio, meters two axes together, contacts stored and emails sent, and warns that taxes and overages can land on top. Built for deliverability at scale through one API and SMTP relay, it is an engineering tool first, a marketing one second.
Where Twilio SendGrid holds up
4.1CE scoreG2 4 · 366 reviewsCapterra 4.2Founded 2009Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | $0 | Not published |
| Basic | $15 | Not published |
| Advanced | $60 | Not published |
| Custom | Contact sales | |
The budget team that wants automation without platform pricing, not the buyer who needs a standing free plan. Moosend counts unique addresses across all your lists so duplicates are not billed twice, and it stacks a nonprofit discount on top of the annual saving.
Critical gapThe software lacks strong native integrations required for complex, high-volume enterprise CRM data synchronization.
Moosend: expert take
Moosend's free option is a time-boxed trial, not a standing tier. Its quiet advantage is counting unique addresses across all your lists, so duplicates are not billed twice, and a nonprofit discount stacks on top of the annual saving. Cheap automation without platform pricing.
Where Moosend holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 738 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2011Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | $0 | Not published |
| Pro | $9 | $7 |
| Moosend+ | Contact sales | |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
What the records say
Buttondown starts cheaper: $9 / mo flat against $33 from Kit, 3.7× apart at the door.
Headcount does not move these bills: Buttondown is $9 / mo and Kit is $33 / mo, $24 / mo apart.
Kit carries 2 of the 5 capability columns on the record; Buttondown shows 0.
Both run a free tier, so either can be tried before the bill starts.
Both publish every tier they sell.
Pick Kit for: The creator selling digital products, not the marketer running broadcast blasts.
Pick Buttondown for: Writers and developers after a Markdown-native newsletter with nothing bolted on by default.
Kit
CE 94Verified July 8, 2026
Buttondown
CE 94 · G2 4.6Verified July 8, 2026
Both price lists on the category axis
Where they differ
Only Kit has on the record
Only Buttondown has on the record
—
Nearly every platform here quotes its cheapest plan at a small starting list, a few thousand contacts at most. That figure says nothing about what you pay at ten thousand or a hundred thousand, which is the range most businesses actually live in. The slope above the entry band is the number worth comparing, and vendors rarely put it on the marketing page.
Two platforms with the same opening price can diverge sharply once the list fills, because one counts every address you ever collected and another counts only the people you still email. Read the band structure, not the first row.
The plan price covers sending to your list. It does not cover the cut a platform takes on digital sales, the per-message charge for SMS, the surcharge to strip the vendor's badge from your footer, or the tax added at checkout in some countries. Each of these sits in a different corner of the billing settings.
None of it is hidden in a dishonest sense; it is priced separately, which means the headline you compared and the invoice you receive are answering different questions. Add up the extras you will actually use before deciding which plan is cheapest.
List size is the meter, and the meter reads your habits: unsubscribed contacts can bill until archived, active profiles are not subscribers, and send-based pricing rewards a big quiet list. Know which of the three your vendor counts before you compare two prices.
The welcome discounts are real and short. Our number tracks how far up the bands a vendor will publish, not how well the mail lands.
Still weighing it? Answer 5 questions, take a shortlist.
How this review is made. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked on the dates shown against each product. Condition columns reflect the feature set recorded on the vendor’s own pages on that date. ComparEdge sells no email marketing platform and takes no vendor payment for placement. Where a vendor publishes nothing, this page says so rather than estimating. Ranking is by transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. What a product can do is shown in the condition columns and carries no weight in the number.