Riverside.fm (free to $99/mo) records studio-quality local video that Teams cannot match. Switch if you need high-fidelity recordings rather than basic meetings.
Alternatives are not always the right move. Microsoft Teams remains strong in these scenarios.
18 video conferencing tools compared. Most teams switch over participant limits, recording features, or pricing.
Expert Take
Microsoft Teams works well when used for basic chat and scheduled video meetings within the Microsoft ecosystem. The friction starts when users juggle multiple chats, meetings, and files simultaneously, which often leads to sluggish performance, input lag, and unexpected crashes. Before buying, compare vs TrueConf, which offers a wider variety of tailored video conferencing layouts compared to Teams' limited options.
Oleh KemFounder & Lead AnalystA remote recording studio that captures locally-recorded, separate audio and video tracks for high-quality content creat. Rated 4.8/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
An async video messaging platform for creating and sharing instantly-watchable screen recordings and webcam messages.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
An API platform for developers to embed real-time video and audio calls directly into any website or application.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
Open-source scheduling infrastructure that automates meeting bookings with its own built-in video conferencing solution.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
An all-in-one video platform for planning, running, and recapping highly engaging, collaborative workshops and training . Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
A team communication hub where you can launch instant audio/video huddles with screen sharing directly from your chats.. Rated 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
No-download webinar platform for marketing teams and lead generation. Rated 4.4/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
A unified communications platform for video meetings, team chat, webinars, and phone systems with high-quality performan. Rated 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5 for Microsoft Teams.
Showing 8 of 18 alternatives
Microsoft Teams compared against all 18 video conferencing alternatives. Pricing, free plan availability, rating, and video conferencing-specific capabilities.
| Tool | Price | Free Plan | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
 | $4/mo | 4.3G2 | |
| $29/mo | 4.8G2 | |
| $18/mo | 4.7G2 | |
| Pay-as-you-go | 4.7G2 | |
| $15/mo | 4.7G2 | |
| $18/mo | 4.7G2 | |
| $8.75/mo | 4.5G2 | |
| $63/mo | No | 4.4G2 |
| $17/mo | 4.5G2 | |
| $8.4/mo | 4.6G2 | |
 | $10/mo | 4.6G2 | |
 | $99/mo | 4.3G2 | |
 | $16/mo | 4.5G2 | |
 | $99/mo | 4.3G2 | |
 | $15/mo | 4.3G2 | |
 | Free | 4.4G2 | |
 | $27/mo | No | 4.4G2 |
 | $14/mo | No | 4.2G2 |
 | $30/mo | No | 4.1G2 |
Riverside.fm works well for teams prioritizing ease of use over feature depth
Loom works well for teams prioritizing ease of use over feature depth
Choose Daily if you need better encryption, larger meeting rooms, or cloud recording