ComparEdge
HomeVideo ConferencingButterAlternatives
Butter software alternatives

Best Butter Alternatives in 2026

Updated May 21, 2026 · 18 ranked

Butter is a strong video conferencing tool, but it is not the only option. Free alternatives include Riverside.fm, Loom, Daily. We compared 18 video conferencing tools to help you find the right fit by use case, price, and technical requirements.

Quick Verdict
Best overall4.8G2
Best value4.3G2
Prices and features change frequently. This data is for reference only. Always verify directly with the vendor before purchase.
Report inaccuracyVendor correction



When Butter Is Still the Better Choice

Alternatives are not always the right move. Butter remains strong in these scenarios.

Stick with Butter if you need
  • +Built-in agenda with time tracking keeps workshops on schedule
  • +Pre-set breakout rooms with unique tools for each group
  • +Interactive flashcards, polls, and soundboards engage participants
  • +Session recaps automatically summarize notes, polls, and chat
  • +Miro and Mural integrations are embedded directly in the session
Consider an alternative when
  • -Free plan is limited to 40-minute sessions and 10 participants
  • -Mobile app has limited functionality compared to the desktop version
  • -No virtual backgrounds or advanced video filters are available
  • -Lacks enterprise-grade features like advanced SSO or regional data hosting

Butter Alternatives by Team Size

18 video conferencing tools compared. Most teams switch over participant limits, recording features, or pricing.

Expert Take

Butter works well when hosting interactive workshops that require structured agendas and pre-set breakout rooms. The friction starts when participants run the platform on standard hardware, as users report significant browser and computer slowdowns during sessions. Before buying, compare vs Zoom: Zoom offers lighter system resource consumption and broader corporate IT acceptance.

·Oleh KemOleh KemFounder & Lead Analyst
Riverside.fm logo
SaaS ToolFrom $19/mo

Riverside. Starts cheaper at $19/mo vs $25/mo.

Why Choose Riverside.fm
  • +Local recording for lossless 48kHz WAV audio & 4K video
  • +Separate audio/video tracks for each participant for easy editing
  • +AI-powered text-based video editor simplifies post-production
  • +Progressive upload ensures files are safe even if connection drops
Points of Friction
  • Free plan watermarks all exported content
  • Mobile app has fewer features than the desktop version
  • Requires significant local storage and upload bandwidth from guests
Loom logo
Loom4.7G2
SaaS ToolFrom $13/mo

Loom works well when teams need to quickly replace recurring meetings with instant screen recordings that require zero rendering wait time. Starts cheaper at $13/mo vs $25/mo.

Why Choose Loom
  • +Instant sharing via link; no rendering or upload wait time
  • +Generous free plan with up to 25 videos/user and 5-min limit
  • +AI-powered summaries, titles, and chapter generation
  • +Interactive features: viewer comments and emoji reactions
Points of Friction
  • No advanced video editing tools like trimming the middle of a clip
  • Mobile app has limited recording and editing functionality
  • Video organization can become cluttered without disciplined folder use
Daily logo
Daily4.7G2
SaaS ToolPay-as-you-go

Daily works well when developers need to rapidly embed real-time video calls using a prebuilt UI and a global SFU network.

Why Choose Daily
  • +Generous free tier: 10,000 participant-minutes/month
  • +Prebuilt UI for rapid deployment with minimal front-end code
  • +Global infrastructure for low-latency calls (SFU network)
  • +Comprehensive SDKs for web, mobile, and desktop platforms
  • +Advanced features like live transcription and real-time streaming
  • +Video API
Points of Friction
  • Usage-based pricing can become expensive at very high scale
  • Free tier lacks HIPAA eligibility and advanced support options
  • Fewer out-of-the-box integrations than some larger competitors
Cal.com (Cal Video) logo
SaaS ToolFrom $15/mo

Cal. Starts cheaper at $15/mo vs $25/mo.

Why Choose Cal.com (Cal Video)
  • +Open-source core allows for deep customization and self-hosting
  • +White-labeling on Team plan for a fully branded client experience
  • +API-first design enables embedding scheduling into any product
  • +Built-in Cal Video simplifies workflow; no third-party app needed
  • +Extensive app store for integrations beyond standard calendars
Points of Friction
  • Cal Video lacks advanced features like virtual backgrounds or polling
  • UI can be less intuitive for users new to advanced scheduling tools
  • Mobile app experience is less polished than the web application
Slack logo
Slack4.5G2
SaaS ToolFrom $8.75/mo

Slack works well when teams need quick, ad-hoc voice and video huddles directly inside their daily chat channels. Butter edges it on ratings (4.7 vs 4.5/5).

Why Choose Slack
  • +Seamlessly start video huddles directly within any channel or DM
  • +Live video, screen sharing, and drawing tools in one lightweight interface
  • +Persistent huddle thread keeps notes and links organized post-call
  • +Deep integration with your existing Slack workspace and workflows
  • +Multi-person screen sharing allows for collaborative presentations
Points of Friction
  • Huddles are limited to 50 participants, even on paid plans
  • No native virtual backgrounds or advanced video filters
  • Video recording is a premium feature, unavailable on the Free plan
Demio logo
Demio4.4G2
SaaS ToolFrom $42/mo

Demio works well when marketing teams need to run live and automated webinars for lead generation without requiring attendee downloads. Butter edges it on ratings (4.7 vs 4.4/5).

Why Choose Demio
  • +Highly rated (4.4/5 on G2)
  • +15 key features including Live Webinars and Automated Webinars
  • +Multiple pricing tiers (3 plans) to match different needs
  • +AI-powered features built in
  • +Workflow automation capabilities
  • +Live Webinars
  • +Automated Webinars
Points of Friction
  • Higher price point (from $59/mo)
Zoom logo
Zoom4.5G2
SaaS ToolFrom $13/mo

Zoom works well when hosting standard virtual meetings with high-quality video and audio. Butter edges it on ratings (4.7 vs 4.5/5).

Why Choose Zoom
  • +Industry-leading video/audio quality and reliability, even on low bandwidth
  • +Generous free plan with 40-minute group meetings for up to 100 attendees
  • +Extensive third-party app integrations via the Zoom App Marketplace
  • +Robust webinar features for large-scale virtual events and broadcasting
  • +Advanced features like immersive views, breakout rooms, and detailed analytics
  • +Video Meetings
Points of Friction
  • Free plan meetings are limited to 40 minutes for 3+ participants
  • Cloud storage on paid plans is limited (1-10GB) without expensive add-ons
  • End-to-end encryption is not enabled by default and limits some features
Google Meet logo
SaaS ToolFrom $7.2/mo

Google Meet works well when hosting quick, browser-based video calls directly from Google Calendar. Butter edges it on ratings (4.7 vs 4.6/5).

Why Choose Google Meet
  • +Seamless integration with Google Calendar, Gmail, and Drive
  • +Browser-based access requires no software installation for guests
  • +Real-time translated captions in multiple languages (paid plans)
  • +Robust security features inherited from Google's global network
  • +Generous free plan with 60-minute meetings for up to 100 people
  • +Video Meetings
  • +Real-time Captions
  • +Polls
Points of Friction
  • Advanced features like polling and Q&A are limited to paid tiers
  • Free plan lacks meeting recording capabilities
  • Fewer third-party app integrations compared to Zoom or Teams

Showing 8 of 18 alternatives



Butter: Feature Comparison

Butter compared against all 18 video conferencing alternatives. Pricing, free plan availability, rating, and video conferencing-specific capabilities.

ToolPriceFree PlanRating
Butter logo
Butteryou
$25/mo4.7G2
Riverside.fm logo
Riverside.fm
$19/mo4.8G2
Loom logo
Loom
$13/mo4.7G2
Daily logo
Daily
Pay-as-you-go4.7G2
Cal.com (Cal Video) logo
Cal.com (Cal Video)
$15/mo4.7G2
Slack logo
Slack
$8.75/mo4.5G2
Demio logo
Demio
$42/moNo4.4G2
Zoom logo
Zoom
$13/mo4.5G2
Google Meet logo
Google Meet
$7.2/mo4.6G2
Whereby logo
Whereby
$8.99/mo4.6G2
Livestorm logo
Livestorm
$99/mo4.3G2
Vowel logo
Vowel
$16/mo4.5G2
Microsoft Teams logo
Microsoft Teams
$4/mo4.3G2
Jitsi Meet logo
Jitsi Meet
Free4.3G2
Webex by Cisco logo
Webex by Cisco
$15/mo4.3G2
Around logo
Around
Free4.4G2
Dialpad logo
Dialpad
$15/moNo4.4G2
GoTo Meeting logo
GoTo Meeting
$12/moNo4.2G2
RingCentral logo
RingCentral
$30/moNo4.1G2

Top Video Conferencing Alternatives to Butter

#1 Top PickSaaS Tool

Riverside.fm works well for teams prioritizing ease of use over feature depth

$19/moFree plan
#2 Runner-UpSaaS Tool
Loom logo
Loom4.7G2

Loom works well for teams prioritizing ease of use over feature depth

$13/moFree plan
#3 Strong ChoiceSaaS Tool
Daily logo
Daily4.7G2

Choose Daily if you need better encryption, larger meeting rooms, or cloud recording

Pay-as-you-goFree plan

Oleh KemOleh KemFounder & Lead AnalystExpert verified·Updated May 21, 2026·Our methodology
Price & Data Intelligence SyncLast verified: May 21, 2026 · CE-VIDEO-2026W21-3B4B22 · No changes detected
Up to date

Frequently Asked Questions



Sources & Data Trail · Butter

  1. 1.Official Website·Official vendor website
  2. 2.Official Pricing Page·Source of verified tiers(Checked: 2026-05-21)
  3. 3.G2·G2 verified user reviews · 4.7/5 · 20 reviews
  4. 4.Capterra·Capterra verified user reviews · 4.6/5
  5. 5.PeerSpot·PeerSpot enterprise peer reviews