Fathom Analytics
CE 91Site owners who want clean, cookie-free traffic counts and nothing heavier.
Every figure here is pulled straight from the vendor's live pricing page, re-checked July 29, 2026, across 7 analytics tools. Weigh each price beside the unit it counts, because a pageview, a tracked event and a monthly user are three different meters wearing one category name.
Analytics tools bill by the unit they count, so the $9 entry price matters less than its unit: a pageview on a traffic counter, a tracked event on a product suite, a monthly user on Amplitude. 5 of the 7 open with a free tier, and the median paid entry is $49, verified July 29, 2026. That free ceiling is where billing really starts.
Ranked by a transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. Capability is not scored. It is the condition grid below. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked per product on the dates shown. ComparEdge sells no analytics tools and takes no payment for placement. How the score is built.
Every row shares one price axis, so moving rightward on it costs genuinely more, even if the unit under it swaps between a site, a seat and a tracked event. Treat the entry as a floor: the free tier caps volume, and the paid meter picks up above it.
Reading the console
A blank cell means we did not see that feature when we captured the page, not that the tool can't do it. The score reflects two inputs and no more: the price a vendor prints, and the rating its users leave. Depth is not in it. A privacy-first pageview counter that publishes every band can therefore rank over a heavier product suite that would rather quote you privately, which is a verdict on disclosure and nothing more. The harder caveat is that these tools barely overlap. A pageview counter and an event platform mapping a signup funnel are not substitutes, whatever the word at the top of the column says.
Scroll the console sideways to reach the remaining conditions.
The shortlist ranks by what the plan actually costs your team, not by list price. Flat plans are folded into a per-team number so they compare like for like. Only vendors rated 85 and up are eligible.
For 6 seats at $49 per seat, start with these
Ranked by monthly team cost, vendors rated 85 and up · Your ceiling for this team: $294 / mo
Fathom Analytics
CE 91Site owners who want clean, cookie-free traffic counts and nothing heavier.
PostHog
CE 90 free tierEngineering-led product teams that want events, session replay, feature flags and SQL in one tool and will read a usage meter to get it.
Each row opens onto every tier plus the day its price was read. Ranking puts the tools with a working, public price list at the top, so a bare traffic counter can rank over a suite doing far more, because the counter shows its bands while the suite waits to be asked.
Transparency scorePricing transparency 60%User satisfaction 40%
Site owners who want clean, cookie-free traffic counts and nothing heavier. Fathom counts pageviews and stops there, a plain traffic counter rather than the product suites that track events within an app. Its whole price list is pageview bands, published in the open bar the very top, so a tool that does the least tops a ranking built on disclosure. Cross a band two months running and it upgrades you automatically.
Critical gapThe platform prevents the migration of legacy historical data from Google Analytics environments.
Fathom Analytics: expert take
One plan, priced only by pageview band, eleven steps from the entry tier up, no free tier. Custom events count as pageviews, and two months over a band auto-upgrades you to the next. Data retention is unlimited and there are no cookie banners to wire up.
Where Fathom Analytics holds up
4.9CE scoreG2 4.8 · 17 reviewsCapterra 4.8Founded 2018Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 100K PV/mo | $15 | $12.50 |
| Up to 200K PV/mo | $25 | Not published |
| Up to 500K PV/mo | $45 | Not published |
| Up to 1M PV/mo | $60 | Not published |
| Up to 2M PV/mo | $100 | Not published |
| Up to 5M PV/mo | $140 | Not published |
| Up to 10M PV/mo | $200 | Not published |
| Up to 15M PV/mo | $290 | Not published |
| Up to 20M PV/mo | $380 | Not published |
| Up to 25M PV/mo | $470 | Not published |
| Over 25M PV/mo | Contact sales | |
Engineering-led product teams that want events, session replay, feature flags and SQL in one tool and will read a usage meter to get it. The free tier covers about a million events a month; the flat Boost, Scale and Enterprise packages plotted here buy support and higher limits, not entry, since the real cost tracks event volume. Deepest feature set in the table, and it prints a number on all of them.
PostHog: expert take
Billing runs off a usage wallet, not a seat: a free million events, then each event, recording and flag meters on its own. The lever people miss is identity, an identified event costing about five times an anonymous one. Boost and Scale buy support, not entry.
Where PostHog holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 1,048 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2020Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Pay-as-you-go | Free | Free |
| Boost | $250 | Not published |
| Scale | $750 | Not published |
| Enterprise | $2,000 | Not published |
Teams that already keep their data in a warehouse and want dashboards and SQL over it, self-hosted or run for them. Metabase queries data you collect elsewhere; it captures no events and replays no sessions, which sits it beside BI tools rather than the trackers here. The open-source edition is free with no user cap, and even the enterprise tier names a floor, which is rare in this field.
Critical gapPublic dashboard access requires expensive licensing.
Metabase: expert take
A BI layer, not a tracker: it queries data you already store and prices by seat, five users on Starter, ten on Pro, extra seats per head. Self-hosted open source is free with no user cap. The enterprise tier is the one wall, quoted against a yearly floor.
Where Metabase holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 145 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2014Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Open Source | Free | Free |
| Starter | $100 | $90 |
| Pro | $575 | $517.50 |
| Enterprise | Not published | $20,000 / yr |
Privacy-first site owners who want funnels and goals on top of a pageview count, priced by the site, not by pageview band. There is no free plan, just a paid trial, so the Starter tier is the floor. Like Fathom it is a traffic tool and stops where the suites' event tracking starts, and custom events count against the pageview quota.
Critical gapThe platform lacks a free tier for non-commercial projects.
Plausible Analytics: expert take
Pricing is flat per site and stepped by pageview band, with no free tier, only a trial. The catch that bites: custom events count against the same pageview quota, and two straight months over the band forces an upgrade. Nonprofits get a discount on Business, annual only.
Where Plausible Analytics holds up
4.8CE scoreG2 4.7 · 11 reviewsCapterra 4.8Founded 2019Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $9 | $7.50 |
| Growth | $14 | $11.67 |
| Business | $19 | $15.83 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Product teams that live in funnels and cohort reports and have the engineering time to keep an event schema clean. Its Growth plan is usage-priced above a free million events, so the axis shows no fixed figure and the bill tracks event volume, with the top tier held for a quote. Strong on analysis, no session replay, and accuracy depends on how much of your client-side tracking ad blockers swallow.
Critical gapCosts scale steeply with event volume as your tracking logs expand.
Mixpanel: expert take
Under a million events a month it is effectively free; past that Growth meters at a published per-thousand rate and the top tier goes to a quote. Session replay is included to a point, then an add-on. Startups under five years can claim a free first year.
Where Mixpanel holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 1,331 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2009Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Growth | $0 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Product and growth teams doing deep behavioural work, with the staff to keep data governance tight enough to stay accurate. Amplitude bills by monthly tracked users, not events, so comparing it to the event tools takes a conversion first. Its free Starter and paid Plus tier are published, but the Growth and Enterprise plans most companies land on are a sales call, and Plus only shows its rate on annual billing.
Critical gapInconsistent event naming causes data integrity failures.
Amplitude: expert take
It counts monthly tracked users, not events, so any comparison with the event tools needs a conversion first. Two catches: the Plus rate only holds on annual billing, and the Growth and Enterprise plans most teams need are quoted. A one-year Growth scholarship exists for small startups.
Where Amplitude holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 2,881 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2012Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | Free | Free |
| Plus | $49 | $582 / yr |
| Growth | Contact sales | |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Teams that want autocapture, every click and pageview logged without tagging events up front, and the patience to clean the noise it makes. Only the free tier shows a number; Growth, Pro and Premier each price by session volume after you install the snippet, which is why it lands last on a disclosure ranking. Autocapture is the draw and the liability at once: less setup now, dirtier data later.
Heap: expert take
Only the smallest teams see a number: the free tier caps at ten thousand sessions, and every paid step is quoted per session volume after you install the snippet. Autocapture is the whole pitch, and session replay stays an add-on on the paid tiers.
Where Heap holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 1,098 reviewsCapterra 4.5Founded 2013Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Growth | Contact sales | |
| Pro | Contact sales | |
| Premier | Contact sales | |
What the records say
Fathom Analytics starts cheaper: $15 / mo flat against $250 from PostHog, 17× apart at the door.
Headcount does not move these bills: Fathom Analytics is $15 / mo and PostHog is $250 / mo, $235 / mo apart.
PostHog carries 6 of the 6 capability columns on the record; Fathom Analytics shows 0.
Users side with Fathom Analytics: 4.8 on G2 against 4.5 for PostHog.
PostHog runs a free tier to start on; Fathom Analytics does not.
PostHog prices everything it sells; Fathom Analytics leaves part of its lineup unpriced.
Pick Fathom Analytics for: Site owners who want clean, cookie-free traffic counts and nothing heavier.
Pick PostHog for: Engineering-led product teams that want events, session replay, feature flags and SQL in one tool and will read a usage meter to get it.
Fathom Analytics
CE 91 · G2 4.8Verified July 16, 2026
PostHog
CE 90 · G2 4.5Verified July 8, 2026
Both price lists on the category axis
Where they differ
Only Fathom Analytics has on the record
—
Only PostHog has on the record
Almost every tool here opens on a free plan or a cheap first tier, and neither is the price you keep. The bill is decided by volume: pageviews on the traffic tools, tracked events on the suites, seats on the warehouse layer. So estimate the volume you actually expect before any published figure means much, because the page quotes a floor and the invoice reflects your traffic.
That is why ranking the category on entry price alone misleads. A pageview counter and a product suite that fires an event on every click answer different questions, and the shared word at the top of the table hides it.
A dashboard is only as good as the collection under it, and these tools collect differently. Browser-side trackers lose hits to ad blockers and privacy settings, and on a technical audience the loss runs high. Server-side collection recovers most of it and costs more engineering to wire up.
Autocapture takes the other bet: it records everything by default, so there is less tagging up front and a lot more noise to filter later. Decide what accuracy the decision actually needs before you trust the chart, because different tools pointed at the same traffic can each report a different figure and each be working as designed.
The unit decides the bill: a pageview counter, an event suite and a tracked-user platform can serve the same site at prices an order apart. Define what you will actually count, then compare tools inside that unit only.
The free tiers run large, and their edges are exact. Publishing the paid step after free is the test, and a good share of this market does not pass it.
Still weighing it? Answer 5 questions, take a shortlist.
How this review is made. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked on the dates shown against each product. Condition columns reflect the feature set recorded on the vendor’s own pages on that date. ComparEdge sells no analytics tools and takes no vendor payment for placement. Where a vendor publishes nothing, this page says so rather than estimating. Ranking is by transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. What a product can do is shown in the condition columns and carries no weight in the number.