Kling AI
CE 90 free tierThe planned shoot, not the first experiment.
From $6.99 a month at the consumer end up to corporate avatar platforms and API tiers sold in credit packs, AI video pricing in 2026 covers markets that barely compete. We read every published plan for 15 vendors and scored each on how much of it you can see before you pay.
The unit on sale is a second of finished video, and the 15 generators here price it four different ways. The cheapest paid month in the category is $6.99, the median $19.49, checked July 29, 2026. Resolution, model and queue speed then decide how many seconds that month actually renders.
Ranked by a transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. Capability is not scored. It is the condition grid below. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked per product on the dates shown. ComparEdge sells no AI video generators and takes no payment for placement. How the score is built.
A mark shows the smallest monthly figure a vendor will take, read off the page where it sells. Ten times the money shifts a mark only two steps right; the axis is a log scale. What no mark can tell you is how much video that month renders.
Reading the console
Vendors that put the most on the record sit at the top. Each mark sits at that smallest monthly figure, and the figure is a door charge, nothing more. Underneath every mark runs a meter no axis can draw: credits charged per second, per clip or per model, an annual minute allotment on the avatar platforms, and media hours counted apart from AI credits on the editors. Two vendors sharing a point on the axis can return very unequal amounts of footage. A tick in a capability column means we found the feature recorded; an unmarked cell means we found nothing on the record for it. That is a gap in the evidence, and we leave it as one.
Scroll the console sideways to reach the remaining conditions.
The shortlist ranks by what the plan actually costs your team, not by list price. Flat plans are folded into a per-team number so they compare like for like. Only vendors rated 85 and up are eligible.
For 6 seats at $19 per seat, start with these
Ranked by monthly team cost, vendors rated 85 and up · Your ceiling for this team: $114 / mo
Kling AI
CE 90 free tierThe planned shoot, not the first experiment.
CapCut AI
CE 93 free tierPhone-first editors cutting vertical video who want captions and effects in one app.
Wan Video
CE 100 free tierThe open-weights option, not the hosted one.
Each card opens on the tiers we verified, the date of the check, and our read on where the meter turns expensive. Ranking is the transparency score; neither price nor popularity moves it.
Transparency scorePricing transparency 60%User satisfaction 40%
Short-form creators who generate in bursts and then stop. Hailuo reads its own cheapest paid month as about three clips at 1080p, and paying annually takes nearly half off three of its four paid tiers.
Hailuo AI: expert take
The top tier is the one place annual billing changes nothing: it holds the same monthly figure either way, while the tiers below drop by nearly half. Credits expire at the end of each month, and unlimited access means one model, not unlimited compute.
Where Hailuo AI holds up
5.0CE scoreG2 5 · 1 reviewsFounded 2023Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Standard | $14.99 | $7.99 |
| Pro | $54.99 | $27.99 |
| Master | $119.99 | $63.99 |
| Max | $199.99 | Not published |
A rate card, not an app. Veo 2 runs through Google Cloud and bills by the second, while the consumer route is a Google AI subscription handing you a monthly credit pool.
Veo 2: expert take
The Veo 2 API rate is $0.50 a second at 720p, and the advanced camera controls cost the same as a plain call. This generation carries no audio track at any price, and Google has published an end-of-life date for the model.
Where Veo 2 holds up
Founded 2024Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free Access | Free | Free |
| Google AI Pro | $19.99 | Not published |
| Google AI Ultra | $249.99 | Not published |
| Veo 2 API | $0.50 / request | Not published |
The open-weights option, not the hosted one. Wan's free tier generates without spending credits at all, one job at a time, and paid credits work only inside its web app rather than the API.
Critical gapThe free tier caps you to one video at a time and locks watermark-free 1080p behind Pro.
Wan Video: expert take
Annual billing is a straight halving on both paid tiers, the largest published annual cut in this category. Purchased credits keep a two-year life, and the larger packs add bonus credits on top of the face amount.
Where Wan Video holds up
Founded 2025Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Pro | $10 | $5 |
| Premium | $40 | $20 |
Phone-first editors cutting vertical video who want captions and effects in one app. CapCut is the one consumer price we could not read anywhere in this category: the vendor says it moves with region and device, and shows it only after you log in.
Critical gapThe platform lacks reliable customer support and consistent AI-generated output accuracy.
CapCut AI: expert take
Even the shape of this ladder is inference. The vendor confirms a yearly option exists but not what it saves, its pricing URL returns a 404, and every figure in our record is a third-party reading pending a logged-in check.
Where CapCut AI holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 150 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2020Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Standard | $9.99 | Not published |
| Popular | $19.99 | Not published |
| Professional | $29.99 | Not published |
The planned shoot, not the first experiment. The Standard card prints $6.99 for the opening month beside the rate it renews at, so the second bill arrives higher by design.
Critical gapThe credit-based pricing model causes unpredictable expenditure during high-volume production cycles.
Kling AI: expert take
A video unit and an image unit share a name and nothing else: the video one costs forty times the image one, and neither converts into the other. Units also expire on 30 or 180-day validity windows, so a prepaid pack carries a clock.
Where Kling AI holds up
4.6CE scoreCapterra 4.5Founded 2023Verified July 12, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | Free | Free |
| Standard | $6.99 | $6.60 |
| Pro | $25.99 | $24.42 |
| Premier | $64.99 | $60.72 |
| Ultra | $127.99 | $119.17 |
Teams that wire generation into their own product instead of clicking through an app. The tier on this axis is PixVerse's platform plan, and its rate table doubles the credit cost the moment you pick the fast queue.
PixVerse: expert take
Credit density rises with the size of the membership, from 150 credits per dollar at the entry tier to about 178 at the top, while pay-as-you-go packs stay flat at 100. Audio is a surcharge on the base clip, never a bundled rate.
Where PixVerse holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 10 reviewsFounded 2023Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | $100 | Not published |
| Scale | $1,500 | Not published |
| Business | $6,000 | Not published |
Solo creators posting short vertical clips who want to pay in small increments. Pika is the only generator here that will take a weekly payment. The top of its lineup runs the opposite way, sold by the year only.
Critical gapPro plan tiers fail to deliver documented performance improvements.
Pika: expert take
Resolution drives the meter harder than duration: the same five-second clip is 12 credits at 480p, 20 at 720p and 40 at 1080p, and ten seconds doubles it again. Rollover credits are a purchase here, not a plan feature.
Where Pika holds up
4.5CE scoreG2 4.4 · 6 reviewsCapterra 4.3Founded 2023Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free / Basic | Free | Free |
| Standard | $10 | $8 |
| Pro | $35 | $28 |
| Fancy | Not published | $76 |
Marketers assembling stock-led videos from a written brief. InVideo caps generations as well as credits at the entry tier, and every plan card carries its own annual switch instead of one toggle for the page.
Critical gapThe engine produces frequent spelling errors requiring manual scene-level post-production correction.
InVideo AI: expert take
The $20 Plus plan is 75 credits, and the price per credit holds flat all the way up the ladder. What moves with the tier is the stock quota: iStock downloads are metered per plan, and team seats are a separate ladder again.
Where InVideo AI holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 171 reviewsCapterra 4.6Founded 2017Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Plus | $20 | $17 |
| Max | $100 | $85 |
| Generative | $200 | $170 |
| Elite | $1,000 | $900 |
| Team: Standard Seat | $50 | Not published |
| Team: Premium Seat | $500 | Not published |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Podcasters and video teams who edit by cutting the transcript instead of the timeline. Descript runs two meters while you work, media hours and AI credits, and they empty at different speeds.
Critical gapThe platform lacks the granular audio mixing tools required by professional editors.
Descript: expert take
The entry plan meters ten media hours against 400 AI credits a month, and the two empty independently. Top-ups are sold only from the middle tier up, so the cheapest paid plan has no way to buy itself out of a busy month.
Where Descript holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 867 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2017Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Hobbyist | $24 | $16 |
| Creator | $35 | $24 |
| Business | $65 | $50 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Training and comms teams that need one script delivered by an avatar in dozens of languages. Synthesia meters video minutes by the year rather than the month, so three heavy weeks can eat an annual allotment.
Critical gapThe software exhibits documented rendering latency and limited native slide integration for complex presentations.
Synthesia: expert take
Starter's allotment is 120 minutes for the year and Creator's is 360, spent whenever you like. Studio avatars stay a yearly add-on even for paying customers, and the free tier renders ten minutes a month that you cannot download.
Where Synthesia holds up
4.7CE scoreG2 4.6 · 2,742 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2017Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | Free | Free |
| Starter | $29 | $18 |
| Creator | $89 | $64 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
Creative professionals who want a whole toolkit rather than one prompt box. Runway's top tier sells unlimited generations at a relaxed rate, the one step on its price list where the counter stops mattering.
Critical gapThe engine restricts complex creative sequences to pre-defined, task-specific generation parameters.
Runway: expert take
Free credits are 125 in total, not a monthly allowance, and only the top tier carries anything over into the next month. The burn rate per model is published nowhere, so the credit count on a plan is the only number you can plan against.
Where Runway holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 18 reviewsCapterra 4.4Founded 2018Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Standard | $15 | $12 |
| Pro | $35 | $28 |
| Unlimited | $95 | $76 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
The localization desk, not the film crew. HeyGen turns one script into avatar takes across languages, and its Pro card hides a credit dropdown where the price per credit does not scale evenly.
Critical gapThe system enforces rigid content guardrails and restricts users to proprietary avatar libraries.
HeyGen: expert take
The $29 Creator plan is 600 credits with a 30-minute ceiling per video. Above it sits a credit dropdown whose price per credit does not move in a straight line, and seats on the Business plan bill on top of the plan itself.
Where HeyGen holds up
4.9CE scoreG2 4.8 · 1,574 reviewsCapterra 4.7Founded 2020Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Creator | $29 | $24 |
| Pro | $49 | $40.67 |
| Business | $149 | $119 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
| HeyGen API Pay-As-You-Go | Contact sales | |
| HeyGen API Enterprise | Contact sales | |
A channel dashboard rather than a video generator. vidIQ spends its AI credits on research, thumbnails and coaching prompts, and its enterprise step is quoted per organization, not per seat.
Critical gapThe subscription model lacks sufficient value for small-scale creators.
vidIQ AI: expert take
Credits here meter questions, not renders: 150 a month on the free tier, 6,000 at the top, spent on research and thumbnails. The coaching tier carries no published price at all, and it is restricted to English-language channels.
Where vidIQ AI holds up
4.6CE scoreG2 4.5 · 33 reviewsCapterra 4.4Founded 2014Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free |
| Boost | $19 | $16.58 |
| Max | $49 | $39 |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
| 1-on-1 Coaching | Contact sales | |
Realism-focused artists who will read a rate table before they render. Luma sells tiers as usage multipliers instead of credit counts, and an HDR pass doubles the rate for an identical shot.
Critical gapThe model produces inconsistent frame rendering and persistent visual artifacts.
Luma AI: expert take
The rate table is the only place a real number appears: 100 credits for five seconds at 720p, 400 at 1080p, a draft pass at a fifth of that. No plan page converts a tier into credits, and no free tier exists to test one.
Where Luma AI holds up
4.5CE scoreCapterra 4.4Founded 2021Verified July 16, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Plus | $30 | $25 |
| Pro | $90 | $75 |
| Ultra | $300 | $250 |
| Team | Contact sales | |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | |
History, not a shortlist entry. Sora never sold a subscription of its own: it came inside a consumer ChatGPT plan, and the record keeps only an API rate card billed per second of output.
Critical gapThe architecture restricts output to 20-second segments, hindering long-form narrative production.
Sora: expert take
What survives is a rate card. Per-second pricing tripled between the standard and pro models, stepped up again with resolution, and halved on a batch tier with a 24-hour turnaround. The app is closed and the API has a published shutdown date.
Where Sora holds up
4.4CE scoreG2 4.3 · 13 reviewsCapterra 4.2Founded 2024Verified July 8, 2026
| Plan | Monthly | Annual |
|---|---|---|
| Sora 2 Standard (API - Standard Tier) | $0.10 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Standard (API - Batch Tier) | $0.05 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Standard Tier, 720p) | $0.30 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Standard Tier, 1024p) | $0.50 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Standard Tier, 1080p) | $0.70 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Batch Tier, 720p) | $0.15 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Batch Tier, 1024p) | $0.25 / second | Not published |
| Sora 2 Pro (API - Batch Tier, 1080p) | $0.35 / second | Not published |
What the records say
Hailuo AI starts cheaper: $14.99 / seat against $19.99 from Veo 2, $5 apart at the door.
For 6 seats, Hailuo AI bills $89.94 / mo and Veo 2 bills $119.94 / mo, $30 / mo between them.
Hailuo AI carries 3 of the 4 capability columns on the record; Veo 2 shows 2.
Both run a free tier, so either can be tried before the bill starts.
Both publish every tier they sell.
Pick Hailuo AI for: Short-form creators who generate in bursts and then stop.
Pick Veo 2 for: A rate card, not an app.
Hailuo AI
CE 100 · G2 5Verified July 16, 2026
Veo 2
CE 100Verified July 8, 2026
Both price lists on the category axis
Where they differ
Only Hailuo AI has on the record
Only Veo 2 has on the record
—
Every meter here charges for what the model produced, not for what you kept. A shot that lands on the fourth attempt cost four renders, and the three you deleted were billed at the rate of the one you published. Runway's Standard month is 625 credits, which its own table reads as 52 seconds of the flagship model. Four takes of a five-second shot and more than a third of that month has gone. No pricing page in this category carries that arithmetic, which is why the $19.49 median tells you so little about a month of real work.
The honest unit is neither the credit nor the second. It is the second you would put in front of a client, and its price is the rate multiplied by the resolution you need, multiplied again by the takes it took to get there. A published per-second rate at least lets you do that sum. Tiers sold as multipliers leave you guessing at the first number.
Seven vendors here price every plan they sell. The gaps are not only enterprise steps. One keeps its consumer price behind a login and says plainly that the figure moves with region, device and whatever promotion is running. Elsewhere the price is printed and the meter is not: credit allotments with no published burn rate for any model, tiers sold as usage multipliers with no credit count anywhere on the page. Neither can be turned into output until you have spent some of it.
That is what the transparency score measures, and that is the reason it does not follow price. A cheap plan with a secret meter is the worse purchase, and no finance team can budget it.
Two markets sit under this one word. A consumer clip generator and a corporate avatar platform bill on different clocks and sell to different buyers. Decide which you are shopping before the numbers start.
Inside either, the unit is a second of footage you would actually publish. Resolution moves that cost more than duration does, and a failed generation bills the same as a keeper. Work out how many seconds survive, then divide. What we rank is how much of the bill a vendor puts in public. Nothing here is a verdict on the footage.
Still weighing it? Answer 5 questions, take a shortlist.
How this review is made. Prices are read from vendor pricing pages and re-checked on the dates shown against each product. Condition columns reflect the feature set recorded on the vendor’s own pages on that date. ComparEdge sells no AI video generators and takes no vendor payment for placement. Where a vendor publishes nothing, this page says so rather than estimating. Ranking is by transparency score: pricing transparency 60%, user satisfaction 40%. What a product can do is shown in the condition columns and carries no weight in the number.