SEO tools · visibility index and market history

SISTRIX
last verified ·tracked since ·reviewed by
Oleh Kem
SISTRIX is an independent German SEO platform, based in Bonn since 2007. Its core metric is the Visibility Index, which measures a domain organic search visibility in a single national market and is updated weekly. As of , SISTRIX starts at $137.49 a month, billed in euros plus VAT.
Price chart of the seo tools category from 29 dollars to 923 dollars 16 a month, plotted on a logarithmic price axis. Markers: Ahrefs at 29, Mangools at 30.50, SpyFu at 39, Moz Pro at 49, SE Ranking at 129, Semrush at 139. A dashed line crosses at the 44 dollars category median. SISTRIX holds the range from 137 dollars 49 to 923 dollars 16 with four tier posts at 137.49, 276.14, 484.11, 923.16 dollars.
the $44 median
SISTRIX range
$137.49 to $923.16
$137.49 to $923.16
$137.49Start
$276.14Plus
$484.11Professional
$923.16Premium
Ahrefs$29/mo
Mangools$30.50/mo
SpyFu$39/mo
Moz Pro$49/mo
SE Ranking$129/mo
Semrush$139/mo$50
$75
$150
$300
$500
$750
$29$923.16
Ahrefs$29/mo
AhrefsAhrefs Starter$29/mo-$108.49 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial Ahrefs site
Mangools$30.50/mo
MangoolsMangools Basic$30.50/mo-$106.99 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial Mangools site
SpyFu$39/mo
SpyFuSpyFu Basic$39/mo-$98.49 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial SpyFu site
Moz Pro$49/mo
Moz ProMoz Pro Starter$49/mo-$88.49 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial Moz Pro site
SE Ranking$129/mo
SE RankingSE Ranking Core$129/mo-$8.49 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial SE Ranking site
Semrush$139/mo
SemrushSemrush SEO$139/mo+$1.51 vs the $137.49 entrySee live pricingOfficial Semrush site
the $44 median
Ahrefs$29/mo
Mangools$30.50/mo
SpyFu$39/mo
Moz Pro$49/mo
SE Ranking$129/mo
Semrush$139/mo$137.49Start
$276.14Plus
$484.11Professional
$923.16Premium
Scale: log axis, USD/mo§ 01 · the essentialsSISTRIX · SEO tools
What is SISTRIX: the Visibility Index, market data and search history
The Visibility Index, the archive behind it, and how SISTRIX bills
SISTRIX is an independent German SEO platform, based in Bonn and founded in 2007. Its core metric is the Visibility Index, which measures a domain organic search visibility in one national market. The index is updated weekly and stored as a historical archive rather than a single snapshot, and the subscription tiers differ mainly by how much of that history they open: three months on the entry plan, five years above it, and the full thirteen years on the two top plans. The same tiers set the analysis limits, from 10,000 results per analysis to unlimited, and the number of user accounts, from one to twelve. Billing is monthly in euros plus VAT, and no annual rate is published.
Every rival can tell you where a domain stands this week. This one can tell you where it stood in 2013, which is a different product sold under the same category name.
- entry rate
- $137.49/mobilled in euros plus VAT
- vs $44 median
- +$93.49sixth of seven doors on our strip
- developer
- SISTRIXBonn, Germany, independent since 2007
- core metric
- Visibility Indexorganic search visibility, one national market
- history depth
- 3 months to 13 yearsthe deepest archive in the category
- results per analysis
- 10,000 to unlimited10k, 50k, 100k, then unlimited
- billing
- monthlyno annual rate is published
- user accounts
- 1, 3, 6 and 12by tier
So much for the published shape. The tier card, the euro figures and the unit price list sit on the full SISTRIX pricing breakdown.
§ 02 · features6 capabilities × 4 plans
SISTRIX features by plan: Visibility Index, history depth and results
Visibility Index, analysis depth, monitored projects and team accounts
One number defines this product. The Visibility Index scores how much organic presence a domain holds in a national market, updated weekly and kept since 2008, and almost everything else in the toolbox exists to explain a movement in it.
- history depth
- 13 yearson the two upper tiers
- results per analysis
- 10k to unlimitedrows a single query returns
- included projects
- 3 to 100monitored sites by tier
- SERP updates
- 2.5k to 100kincluded per month
| Capability ↓ · plan → | Start $137.49/mo | Plus $276.14/mo | Professional $484.11/mo | Premium $923.16/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Row 01Visibility IndexThe score the platform is built on | current index3 months of record | + 5 year curvecampaign history | 13 yearsthe full archive | 13 yearswith unlimited results |
| Row 02Analysis depthRows a single query returns | 10,000per analysis | 50,000per analysis | 100,000per analysis | unlimitedno row cap |
| Row 03Monitored projectsSites tracked with their own data | 3 projectsno extras purchasable | 15 projectsextras 9.90 € each | 40 projectsextras 8.49 € each | 100 projectsextras 5.90 € each |
| Row 04Team accountsPeople the tier carries | 1 accountnone purchasable | 3 accountsextras $28.77 each | 6 accountsextras $28.77 each | 12 accountsextras $28.77 each |
| Row 05Systems integrationGetting the index outBelow the third tier the data stays in the interface | interface onlyno API | interface onlyno API | API accesssystems integration | API + exportslargest export budget |
| Row 06Support and governanceWhat the tier carries beyond data | standardself serve | + workshopin-person session | + phone supportpremium, in English | + roles and auditVIP support and training |
readingHover or tap any cell for its quota, its tier rate and what it means for the bill
every column includes exactly 1 user · the second seat adds $28.77/mo to any column · full disclosure: 4 of 4 tiers priced
Slide the grid sideways. The capability column stays put.
The index is worth understanding before it is quoted. It is a single weekly score per domain per country, built from ranking positions weighted by search demand, which makes it a measure of presence rather than of traffic. Two uses hold up. Compare a domain against its national competitors on one chart, where the relative shape tells you who is gaining without either party publishing analytics. Then read a drop backwards against the date it happened: with thirteen years behind the curve, an algorithm update, a migration or a penalty leaves a signature that a three month window would simply not contain.
Where this platform declines to compete is breadth. There is no answer engine module, no social scheduling, no content generator, and the keyword database is not the largest here. What it holds instead is memory and market focus, and those are the two things a rival cannot bolt on next quarter.
§ 03 · plan limits3 ceilings · accounts · history
SISTRIX limits: user accounts, results per analysis and history depth
User accounts, results per analysis and how far the archive reaches
The tier is decided by three ceilings and one of them is unusual. Accounts and results behave as expected, and then memory turns out to be a paid feature: how far back the data reaches depends on which tier is holding it.
User accounts: 1, 3, 6 and 12 by tier
1 · 3 · 6 · 12 accountsPeople arrive with the tier rather than being sold beside it, and the count rises steeply: one account at $137.49, three at $276.14, six at $484.11, twelve at $923.16. Extra accounts cost $28.77 a month each, except on the entry tier, which buys none at all. A two person team therefore starts at $276.14 whatever its other needs are.
Results per analysis: 10,000, then 50,000 and 100,000
10k · 50k · 100k · unlimitedEvery query returns a capped number of rows: ten thousand on the entry tier, fifty thousand on the next, a hundred thousand above that, uncapped at the top. For a national market study this is the limit that bites first, because a broad keyword or a large competitor domain exhausts ten thousand rows long before the analysis is finished.
History depth: 3 months, 5 years, then 13
3 months · 5 years · 13 yearsThis is the ceiling nobody expects. The entry tier remembers three months, which is enough to watch a campaign and not enough to explain a drop. Five years arrives at $276.14, and the complete thirteen year record only at $484.11 and above. Since the archive is the reason most people choose this platform, the working tier for that job is the third one, not the first.
Projects, crawls and SERP updates are counted
3 to 100 projectsMonitored projects run 3, 15, 40 and 100 by tier, crawled pages 30,000 to four million, and SERP updates 2,500 to 100,000 a month. Each of those has a published unit price above the allowance, so a tier is a starting allocation rather than a hard wall. The exception is the entry tier again: it may not buy extras of any kind.
Billing is monthly, and there is no yearly rate
cancelable monthlyNo annual discount exists here, which is rare enough in this category to be a decision rather than an oversight. Every tier is cancelable at the end of the month. That suits a project engagement or a market study with a fixed end. It also means there is no annual commitment to trade for a lower rate.
Put the ceilings together and the four tiers read differently than they look. The first tier is a single seat with a three month memory and no right to buy anything extra, which makes it a trial with an invoice rather than a working plan. The product people describe when they recommend SISTRIX starts at the third tier.
One more line belongs on the invoice and not on the tier card. The vendor prices in euros and adds tax on top, so the figures we print here are converted at the European Central Bank reference rate on the day of our check. A buyer paying from inside the EU should expect VAT above the rate, and a buyer outside it should expect currency movement between checks.
§ 04 · add-ons5 unit prices · 1 tier locked out
Projects, crawls and SERP updates: what SISTRIX sells by the unit
Extra accounts, projects, page crawls and SERP updates by the unit
Extras here are not modules that add capability. They are units of capacity with a published price that falls as the tier rises, which reads closer to a wholesale list than to a feature upsell, and the entry tier may not buy from it at all.
Additional accounts$28.77/monot on the entry tier
Additional accounts: colleagues past what the tier carries
Each extra person costs the same on every tier that may buy one, which is unusual: most vendors here raise the seat rate as the plan grows. The catch sits at the bottom, where the entry tier holds one account and cannot add a second at any price.
without itA second colleague means moving up a tier, not adding a line to the invoice.
Additional projectsfrom 5.90 € eachrate falls by tier
Additional projects: monitored sites past the allowance
Projects are the count that maps to clients, and the unit price drops as the tier rises: 9.90 € on the second tier, 8.49 € on the third, 5.90 € at the top. An agency crossing its allowance can pay for the overflow instead of climbing, which at these unit prices saves real money.
without itA client book that outgrows the allowance forces the next tier, and the steps here are large.
Additional page crawlsfrom 0.14 € per 1,000rate falls by tier
Additional page crawls: audit volume beyond the tier
Crawling is billed per thousand pages, from 0.21 € down to 0.14 € as the tier rises, on top of allowances that run from 30,000 pages to four million. For a large catalogue audited often, the per unit rate matters more than the included figure.
without itAudits stop at the allowance until the next billing month begins.
Additional SERP updatesfrom 0.02 € eachrate falls by tier
Additional SERP updates: fresher rankings on demand
Ranking refreshes are counted individually, from four cents down to two as the tier rises, above allowances of 2,500 to 100,000 a month. This is how a team tracking a volatile market buys freshness without buying capacity it will not use.
without itRankings refresh on the schedule the allowance permits, which is fine until a launch week.
Additional content projectsfrom 3.99 € eachrate falls by tier
Additional content projects: optimisation work past the quota
Content projects run 10, 25 and 100 a month by tier with plagiarism checks alongside, and extras are priced individually. It is the smallest line here and the clearest sign of how this vendor thinks: everything is a countable unit with a price.
without itContent optimisation waits for next month's allowance.
The shape of this list says more about fit than any feature comparison. Capacity is granular and cheap to top up, which suits a team whose workload swings month to month. The entry tier stands outside that logic entirely: it cannot buy a second account, a fourth project or an extra crawl, so its only route past any limit is the next tier.
§ 05 · data access2 channels out · 1 gate
SISTRIX data access: API from Professional and export credits above it
Where the numbers go: exports, the API and your own systems
Getting numbers out of this platform is gated by tier rather than metered by volume, and the gate sits at the third tier. Below it the data stays inside the interface.
Visibility Index and rankings→Your own systems
API access for systems integration arrives on the third tier and not before. Piping the index into a client dashboard, a warehouse or an internal report therefore decides the plan by itself, well ahead of seats or the results cap.
Analyses and keyword sets→Exports
Exports are credited rather than unlimited, and the generous allocation sits at the top tier alongside roles, rights management and an audit log. For an agency handing data to a client, the export budget is the line to check before signing.
Roles, rights and an audit log←Your team structure
Governance is a tier feature here rather than an enterprise contract: role management and an audit trail arrive with the top published plan, which is a lower bar than the negotiated agreements the larger platforms use for the same thing.
The practical reading for a technical buyer: this platform is designed to be read, not piped. The index is its own currency and the vendor keeps it inside the toolbox until the third tier, so anyone planning to automate around it should price the connection into the plan choice from the start.
§ 06 · changes2 dated checks
SISTRIX in 2026: the plans hold while the extras become a price list
Two dated passes at sistrix.com, and the extras it began itemising
Rates held across our checks, which is worth stating plainly in a category where two rivals restructured this year. What did move is the surrounding detail: the vendor now publishes a unit price for almost every kind of capacity.
first trackedlatest check
First reading. Four tiers, monthly billing only, euro rates plus tax, and user accounts included by tier rather than sold as seats.
The extras become a price list. Rates unchanged. The comparison table now itemises projects, crawls, SERP updates and content projects with per unit prices that fall as the tier rises.
For a buyer this is the least eventful record in the category, and that is information too. A vendor that leaves its rates alone and adds precision to its unit pricing is optimising for predictability, which fits a customer base doing long term market work rather than chasing feature announcements.
§ 07 · who it fits4 working setups · 4 reasons to pass
Who should use SISTRIX: DACH agencies, EU teams and market analysts
A German-market SEO, an agency and an analyst, against Start and Plus
We priced four setups against the published tiers. Each names what it needs, the rate that produces and the ceiling it meets first. Account arithmetic uses the published extra account rate, which applies on every tier except the entry one.
Freelancers watching a handful of domains
The entry tier gives one account, three projects, ten thousand results per analysis and three months of history. It answers the question of who is winning right now and cannot answer why last spring went wrong.
inputs3 projects · 1 person · current datainvoice floor$137.49 × 1 = $137.49/mofirst limithistory: three months ends before most SEO work does
In-house teams in a single national market
The second tier is where the product starts working: three accounts, fifteen projects, fifty thousand results and five years of record. For a brand watching its own market against four or five competitors this is the honest recommendation.
inputs15 projects · 3 people · 5 yearsinvoice floor$276.14 + 2 × $28.77 = $333.68/mofirst limithistory: the full archive waits one tier higher
Agencies selling into DACH and EU markets
The third tier carries six accounts, forty projects, the complete thirteen year archive and the API. That combination is why agencies in German speaking markets buy this platform rather than a larger international one.
inputs40 projects · 6 people · APIinvoice floor$484.11 + 5 × $28.77 = $627.96/mofirst limitresults: a hundred thousand rows caps the widest studies
Analysts running large market studies
Uncapped results, a hundred projects, twelve accounts, roles and rights, an audit log and the largest export budget. This is a research licence more than a marketing subscription, and the buyers are usually publishers, retailers and consultancies studying whole markets.
inputs100 projects · 12 people · unlimited resultsinvoice floor$923.16 + 11 × $28.77 = $1239.63/mofirst limitnone published: the tiers end at $923.16
Your market is the US alone → the index covers many countries, but the depth and the reputation are strongest in German speaking Europe.
You need answer engine tracking → there is no module for it here, while three rivals on this strip sell one.
A yearly discount is the plan → no annual rate exists at any tier, so the usual fifth off is not available to negotiate.
One person on a budget → the entry tier cannot buy a second account, an extra project or a single additional crawl.
Stated plainly: this is a measurement instrument for people who study markets over years, sold to a customer base that values the archive more than the toolbox. It rewards patience and punishes anyone who arrived looking for the widest feature list at the price.
§ 08 · alternativessix rivals · gap to the $137.49 entry
SISTRIX alternatives: Semrush, SE Ranking, Moz Pro, Ahrefs and Mangools
Who gets compared with SISTRIX, and what those buyers lose
Only one rival on this strip opens above this door, and the rest sit well below it. The spread runs $29 to $139, which puts the median at $44. Four of the six open between $29 and $49, then the strip goes quiet until $129. The distance from the cheap end to this end is what buyers are really weighing.
$29SISTRIX entry: $137.49 →
The broad platform bought instead of this one when the brief is international rather than national. Its entry rate is about the same, covers paid search and answer engines that this vendor leaves alone, and charges $45 for each extra person where accounts here come with the tier.
$8.49 under this door and aimed at reporting workflow rather than archive depth. Agencies compare the two when the deliverable is a monthly client report; this platform wins when the question involves last year rather than last week.
A gentler comparison: its authority score plays the role this index does, with far less history behind it and colleagues included in the tier. Teams choose it for simplicity, not for market depth.
Advertising history rather than organic visibility, and a different question entirely: what a competitor has been paying for and since when. At $98.49 under this door it sits beside this platform rather than against it.
The far end of the strip, at $30.50, doing keyword research and light tracking. Nothing about it addresses market visibility over time, which is the whole reason this platform exists.
A specialist purchase in the opposite direction: link data rather than market presence. Its published floor is $29, the tier that actually runs projects costs far more, and colleagues are billed per head there rather than included.
What people give up when they leave is usually the archive, and what they gain is breadth. The dearest rival covers paid search, content and answer engines from one account for about the same money. The tools underneath this one do a single job well and remember almost nothing. Nobody else on this strip keeps thirteen years of a national market on one chart, and for the agencies that buy this platform that single fact settles the comparison. The full ranking sits on the seo tools category page.
§ 09 · our verdictCE 4.5/5 · signed
Is SISTRIX worth it in 2026: our verdict on the visibility platform
What thirteen years of national visibility data is worth monthly
Verdict · SISTRIX · ★★★★★★★★★★CE 4.5/5
The fact that organises SISTRIX pricing is the missing lever: the vendor sells no annual discount at any tier. Converted at the August 2026 rate the four tiers run $137.49 to $923.16 a month, billed in euro plus taxes and cancelable month by month. Measured against what this category usually charges to get in, that entry sits high, and the vendor never apologises for it. The printed rate is the only rate, whether an account stays a month or five years.
The tier logic is unusually clean once you are inside. Each step buys users, bigger quotas and cheaper unit rates at once, so the extras table rewards moving up rather than topping up. The catch is the entry tier itself. Start is sealed, with three months of history, one user and nothing purchasable, so the first growth spurt costs the whole $138.65 converted step to Plus rather than a small line on the invoice.
what drives this invoice
- included users: 1, 3, 6 or 12 by tier, then $28.77 a month converted for each one more, from Plus up only.
- the included quotas: 3 to 100 projects, 30,000 to 4 million crawled URLs, 2,500 to 100,000 SERP updates by tier.
- the unit rates step down by tier: every extra gets cheaper one tier up, halving on some lines between Plus and Premium.
- the invoice currency: euro plus taxes, so the dollar cost moves with the exchange rate.
when not to buy SISTRIX
- You want a discount for committing: none exists, at any tier, on any cycle.
- Your budget is fixed in dollars: the bill is euro plus taxes, and the converted figure moves with the rate.
- You will outgrow Start's quotas within months: the tier cannot be topped up, and the exit is the full step to Plus.
- You need history on a small budget: the entry archive is three months, and five years starts at $276.14 converted.
what it does well
- The Visibility Index is a single comparable number per country, kept weekly since 2008, and nothing else on this strip holds that much history.
- User accounts come with the tier, at one, three, six and twelve, instead of being billed per person.
- Capacity is sold by the unit with published rates that fall as the tier rises, so a busy month costs a little rather than forcing a tier change.
- Every tier cancels at the end of the month, which suits a fixed term market study.
- Governance is priced rather than negotiated: roles, rights and an audit log come with the top tier instead of a contract.
where it gets in the way
- History is tiered, and the full archive most people buy this for starts only at $484.11.
- The entry tier holds one account and may not buy a second, an extra project or a single additional crawl.
- No annual rate exists at any tier, so the discount common elsewhere in this category is unavailable.
- Rates are in euros plus tax, so the dollar figure here moves with the reference rate between our checks.
- There is no answer engine tracking, where three rivals on this strip now sell it.
- Results per analysis cap at ten thousand rows on the entry tier, which ends a broad market study early.
The price, in short
- Entry $137.49/mo · verified
- Number 6 of 7 by entry rate, $8.49 over SE Ranking and $1.51 under Semrush
- The four tiers, the euro figures behind them and the unit price list are laid out on our SISTRIX pricing breakdown
§ 10 · questions12 questions
SISTRIX in short: the index, the euro billing and the history depth
The Visibility Index, euro billing, history depth and user accounts
Q1What is SISTRIX used for?
Measuring and comparing organic search presence in a national market over time. Teams use the Visibility Index to see who is gaining or losing in their country, then use the keyword, link and on-page tools to explain the movement.
Q2What is the SISTRIX Visibility Index?
A single weekly score for how much organic presence a domain holds in one country, built from ranking positions weighted by search demand. It measures presence rather than traffic, and it belongs to SISTRIX, so it compares domains against each other rather than against any figure Google publishes.
Q3How far back does SISTRIX data go?
To 2008 on the tiers that carry the full archive, which is the deepest record among the tools we price here. The catch is that history is tiered: three months at the entry level, five years above it, and the complete thirteen years only from the third tier.
Q4Is SISTRIX only for German websites?
No, the index covers many national markets, but the depth and the reputation are strongest in German speaking Europe, where it is often the reference tool. For a business selling only into the US, a rival with a larger keyword database usually serves better.
Q5Does SISTRIX have an annual plan?
No, and this is deliberate rather than an omission. Every tier bills monthly and cancels at the end of the month, so the twenty percent yearly discount common in this category simply does not exist here. It suits project work and removes a negotiating lever.
Q6How many people can use one SISTRIX subscription?
One, three, six or twelve accounts depending on the tier, included rather than sold as seats. Extra accounts cost $28.77 a month on every tier except the entry one, which holds a single account and cannot add another at any price.
Q7Does SISTRIX have an API?
Yes, from the third tier upward. Below that the data stays inside the interface, so a team planning to pipe the index into its own dashboards is choosing that tier for the connection rather than for its quotas.
Q8Why are SISTRIX prices shown in dollars here?
Because the vendor prices in euros and adds tax, while our whole category is compared in dollars. We convert at the European Central Bank reference rate on the day of the check, so figures here line up with the rest of the strip. Inside the EU expect VAT above that rate.
Q9Does SISTRIX track AI search results?
Not as a product line. Where three rivals here sell answer engine monitoring as a module or a quota, this platform stays on classic search visibility. For a brief that now includes assistant coverage, it would sit alongside another tool rather than replace one.
Q10Is the entry tier enough to start with?
Rarely, and it is worth knowing why before buying. It carries one account, three projects, ten thousand results per analysis and three months of history, and it may not purchase extras of any kind. It reads as a paid trial rather than a working plan.
Q11Who should not use SISTRIX?
Teams working only in the US market, anyone whose brief includes answer engine visibility, agencies that need branded client reporting as a first class feature, and buyers who were counting on an annual discount to reach their budget.
Q12What are the best SISTRIX alternatives?
Semrush for breadth at a comparable rate, SE Ranking when reporting workflow matters more than archive depth, Ahrefs for link research, Moz Pro for a simpler authority metric with colleagues included, and Mangools when keyword work is the whole job. The cheapest of them opens at $29, which is a different market from this one.
§ 11 · read nextthree tools · the ranking
Read next: Semrush, SE Ranking and Ahrefs, plus the category ranking
The three that measure differently, plus the category ranking
for breadth at a similar rateThe comparison that decides most of these purchases is against the broadest platform on the strip, Semrush , set out with its own seat arithmetic.
for agency reportingAgencies weighing reporting workflow rather than archive depth usually land on SE Ranking , where the modules explain why the entry rate looks lower than it is.
for link researchLink prospecting is not what this platform is for, and that ground belongs to Ahrefs .
for the whole rankingEvery product we price in this category, with its verified entry rate and position, is ranked among SEO tools .