Feature Overview: Top SentinelOne Alternatives
SentinelOne compared against all 8 endpoint security (xdr/edr) alternatives. Pricing, free plan availability, rating, and endpoint security (xdr/edr)-specific capabilities.
| Tool | Price | Free Plan | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pay-as-you-go | No | 4.9G2 | |
| $2.08/mo | No | 4.9G2 | |
| Custom | No | 4.7G2 | |
| $7.99/mo | No | 4.6G2 | |
| Pay-as-you-go | No | 4.6G2 | |
| $9.17/mo | No | 4.7G2 | |
| Custom | No | 4.6G2 | |
| $6.75/mo | No | 4.5G2 | |
| Custom | No | 4.3G2 |
How Does SentinelOne Compare to Alternatives?
Independently verified metrics. Sources: AV-TEST, MITRE ATT&CK evaluations, vendor docs. Verified 2026.
| Tool | Agent CPU% | Agent RAMMB | MTTDmin | MTTRmin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SentinelOne (this) | 1 | 50 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Huntress | - | - | - | - |
| Cynet | 0.5 | 60 | 1 | 1 |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 1 | 40 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Sophos | 1 | 100 | 2 | 1 |
| Fortinet | - | - | - | - |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | - | - | - | - |
When Should You Stick with SentinelOne?
Alternatives are not always the right move. SentinelOne remains strong in these scenarios.
- +Autonomous AI response without human intervention
- +Storyline attack correlation simplifies threat hunting
- +Consistently top-performing in MITRE ATT&CK evaluations
- +Unified Singularity XDR across endpoint, cloud, identity
- -To improve SentinelOne, I would suggest adding a network detection and response capability.
- -There is a clear roadmap for improvements, including enhancing capabilities with AI and seamless functionality in an MSP model for
- -One area for improvement would be the self-healing nature of the agent.
- -To enhance our already strong partnership with SentinelOne, we should focus on improving collaboration.
SentinelOne Alternatives by Business Size
8 alternatives evaluated by features, pricing, and real-world use cases.
Expert Take
SentinelOne works well when security teams need autonomous behavioral AI to correlate attacks and replace basic antivirus tools. The friction starts when users experience slow system performance and productivity-disrupting false positives, or when navigating a dashboard that some find overly complex to configure. Before buying, compare vs Webroot, which operates more as a traditional antivirus rather than a full EDR platform with behavioral rollback capabilities.
Oleh KemFounder & Lead AnalystManaged security platform for MSPs with threat hunting, EDR, and 24/7 SOC coverage..
- +Highest G2/Capterra ratings in endpoint security (4.8/4.9)
- +Human-verified threats eliminate alert fatigue
- +Best value MDR for SMBs at $5/endpoint/mo
- +Built by hackers: deep adversary insight for SMB threat patterns
- +24/7 Human Threat Hunting
- +Managed EDR
- +Managed SIEM (SIEM Lite)
- −I would like to see an easier way to whitelist sites or to monitor some of the reporting that Huntress Managed EDR does.
- −We would love for Huntress Managed EDR to ingest logs from Microsoft Sentinel.
- −One downside of Huntress Managed EDR, compared to the CrowdStrike agent, is that it takes a longer time to push it out to all of o
Autonomous XDR platform for mid-market with bundled EDR, UEBA, network analytics, and 24/7 MDR.. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.8/5).
- +24/7 MDR (CyOps) included: rare value at this price
- +All-in-one: EDR + network + UEBA + deception in one agent
- +High G2 rating (4.7) for XDR category
- +AutoRemedy reduces response time without SOC headcount
- −One area where Cynet needs improvement is tamper protection for Mac and Linux agents.
- −There are some issues, especially with the integrations.
- −Their deployment needs some work, especially with integration with remote monitoring management systems like Datto AutoTask or Con
Cloud-native endpoint protection, EDR, and XDR powered by CrowdStrike's Threat Graph and ML.. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.7/5).
- +Best-in-class threat intelligence from 29k+ customer sensor network
- +Falcon OverWatch managed threat hunting is industry-leading
- +Threat Graph processes 1T+ events/week for AI detection
- +Comprehensive XDR platform covering endpoint to cloud
- −The improvements needed for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security include reducing its high cost, which is currently quite expensive,
- −I recommend enhancing CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, particularly in the areas of vulnerability management and agent troublesh
- −In terms of improvement, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security could expand into the remediation path.
Network detection and response platform analyzing real-time traffic for threats, lateral movement, and anomalies.. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.7/5).
- +Best-in-class network detection and response (NDR)
- +Detects lateral movement that endpoint tools miss
- +Works on unmanaged devices (IoT, OT) without agents
- +CrowdStrike integration creates powerful XDR combination
- +Network Detection & Response (NDR)
- +ML-Based Behavioral Analytics
- +Full-Packet Capture
- +Encrypted Traffic Analysis
- −What they can improve would be building a broader reach in terms of capabilities.
- −We've had some struggles getting it to see everything that we want to see.
- −The solution could get more aggressive in the discounting of the overall cost.
A unified security platform for SMBs and mid-market, combining endpoint, firewall, and MDR managed from a single cloud c. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.8/5).
- +Sophos Central provides a single pane of glass for endpoint, server, and firewall.
- +Synchronized Security links endpoints and firewalls for automated threat response.
- +Strong focus on MSPs with multi-tenant management and flexible billing.
- +Intercept X combines deep learning AI with anti-ransomware and exploit prevention.
- +Full-service MDR offering includes 24/7 threat hunting and complete remediation.
- −UTM/XG Firewall reporting can be less granular than dedicated network tools.
- −The platform's breadth can lead to a steeper learning curve for some modules.
- −Performance impact on older endpoints can be noticeable during intensive scans.
Enterprise network security platform with FortiGate NGFW, SD-WAN, SASE, endpoint, and cloud security.. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.7/5).
- +680k+ customers: the network security market leader
- +Single-vendor Security Fabric simplifies architecture
- +FortiGuard Labs provides best-in-class threat intelligence
- +OT/IoT security is industry-leading
- +Next-Generation Firewall (FortiGate)
- +Endpoint Protection (FortiEDR)
- +SASE (FortiSASE)
- +SD-WAN
- −One drawback of Fortinet FortiGate is that they provide two types of models: one with a hard disk and another without.
- −We haven't tapped into most of the functionalities that Fortinet FortiGate offers because we're using it just for gateway security
- −From a support perspective, I had more issues that I didn't think the person on my case handled the way I was expecting.
An integrated EPP and EDR solution that leverages network context and global threat intelligence to prevent, detect, and. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.6/5).
- +Leverages Talos intelligence, one of the world's largest threat research teams.
- +Deep integration with Cisco network gear for unparalleled device context.
- +Unified XDR visibility via the included SecureX platform.
- +Orbital advanced search provides deep OS-level visibility using osquery.
- +Strong exploit prevention and behavioral protection against fileless malware.
- +Next-Gen Antivirus
- −Lacks native Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and device control features.
- −Full XDR capabilities require investment in the broader Cisco Secure portfolio.
- −Higher resource consumption (CPU/memory) on endpoints compared to some rivals.
XDR, endpoint, email, and network security platform formed from the McAfee/FireEye merger.. SentinelOne edges it on ratings (5.0 vs 4.4/5).
- +40k+ enterprise customers provide strong market credibility
- +Broad XDR coverage across endpoint, email, network, cloud
- +Helix SIEM/SOAR integration
- +FireEye legacy threat intelligence
- +XDR Platform (Trellix XDR)
- +Endpoint Security (ENS)
- +EDR
- −The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems.
- −For Trellix Active Response, there is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility
- −I expected Active Response's user interface to be much more analytical.
Common Questions About Switching from SentinelOne
Sources & verification
| Source | What was checked | Last checked |
|---|---|---|
| Official Website | Official vendor website | — |
| G2 | G2 verified user reviews · 4.9/5 · 113 reviews | — |
| TrustRadius | TrustRadius verified reviews | — |
| PeerSpot | PeerSpot enterprise peer reviews | — |
Every fact on this SentinelOne pricing page is tied to a named source and a verification date. Freshness-sensitive figures trace to the sources above; verify against the vendor before relying on them.

