Llama (Meta) pricing plans
★★★★★ 4.7 CE

Llama (Meta) Pricing: Plans & API Token Cost Calculator 2026

The weights are free; your bill is the GPUs or the hosting provider that runs them. Enterprise licensing applies only above 700M monthly active users.

Llama (Meta) interface screenshot

Llama (Meta) plans and pricing

High· Verified July 8, 2026
Custom

Enterprise License

Required only above 700M monthly active users, this is a custom commercial agreement with Meta and a direct partnership, with pricing negotiated rather than published

Custom
Required for products with over 700M monthly active users (MAU)
Custom commercial license agreement with Meta
Direct enterprise partnership opportunities
Access to full model weights and deployment rights
Compliance with custom enterprise terms
Contact sales

Llama (Meta) pricing: the quick answer

Quick answerHigh· Verified July 8, 2026

Llama is free to download and self-host as of July 8, 2026, with no license fee for products under 700 million monthly active users. The weights cost nothing; your real spend is the compute to run them, either your own GPUs or a third-party inference provider. Hosting providers like Groq, Together AI, and Fireworks serve the Llama 4 family at low per-token rates, though the exact price depends heavily on which provider and model size you pick, so compare rate cards rather than assume one figure. Only organizations above 700M monthly active users need Meta's custom Enterprise License, which has no published price.

  • Open WeightsFree
  • Enterprise LicenseCustom
Run your token volumes through the cost calculator to estimate the actual monthly API bill.
Free tier
Yes
Billing model
Token-Based
Annual discount
Not offered

Llama (Meta) is free to start, against a $8.50/mo median across 10 large language models tools we track.


API Token Pricing

Llama 4 Maverick (via Groq)$0.5$0.77
Llama 4 Scout (via Groq)$0.11$0.34

Llama (Meta) cost calculator

Llama (Meta) Hidden Costs & Pitfalls

What sits on top of the plan fee

Nothing on the model itself shows up on an invoice. Every real number here is downstream: the hardware you rent, the provider you route through, or the license you only need at massive scale.

Self-hosting cost is GPUs, not software
The weights are free, so the bill is entirely infrastructure. Running the large 405B model needs a high-end GPU cluster, and those hours dominate any budget; a small 8B model fits on modest hardware, but a 405B deployment can make self-hosting uneconomical for a low-traffic app. There is no per-token fee from Meta, only whatever your cloud or on-prem GPUs cost to keep running.
your compute, no license fee
Third-party providers charge per token instead
If you would rather not run GPUs, providers host Llama and bill per token, and the rate depends heavily on which one you pick. On Groq, Llama 4 8B is $0.05 per 1M input and $0.08 per 1M output, while the larger 3.3 70B is $0.59 input and $0.79 output. The same model on AWS, Together AI, or Fireworks will price differently, so compare providers rather than assuming one published rate holds everywhere.
$0.05 to $0.79 per 1M, provider-dependent
Meta's own Llama API is invite-only with no price
Meta runs a first-party Llama API, but it is waitlist and invite gated and publishes no public rate, so you cannot plan a budget around it. For anything you can act on today, the choices are self-hosting or a third-party provider. The Enterprise License only enters the picture above 700M monthly active users, and that too is negotiated rather than listed.
not published
The renewal jump, credit expiry and every discount worth having are in the Llama (Meta) true cost guide, with an email generator for negotiating team and enterprise rates.
Llama (Meta) Cost Analysis

Llama (Meta) pricing, read against its live plans and category

Positioning

Llama undercuts the whole category by giving its Open Weights away for free, where the median sits at $8.4/mo. Instead of charging per seat or per token, Meta lets you download and self-host the Llama 4 family at zero software cost across every parameter size. The Enterprise License only triggers above 700 million monthly active users, which makes it a high-value proposition for any scaling startup that stays under that line.

Cost drivers

  • 1Inference Infrastructure: hosting the large Llama 4 models needs high-end GPU clusters, and those hours are where the budget actually goes.
  • 2Operational Overhead: self-hosting demands dedicated engineering for deployment, quantization, and ongoing maintenance.
  • 3Fine-Tuning Costs: the weights are free, but training and distilling on your own data burns real compute.

Watch-outs

The software is free, but users worry loudly about the hardware bill to run it. Hosting the larger sizes can make deployment uneconomical for a small, low-traffic app.

Strengths

Even at $0, the license itself is the win: full commercial use and modification rights on a strong open model.

  • Permissive license allows for commercial use and modification
  • State-of-the-art performance for open-source models
  • Full data control and privacy via self-hosting

What users say

if 400b is num of active params, inference is gonna be too expensive.

Reddit (negative)

Those llama 70b prices

Reddit (positive)

Editor’s take

The Open Weights plan is the right pick for developers and enterprises that want full data privacy, deep customization, and zero licensing fees, and can run the hardware. For teams without the infrastructure to self-host, a managed alternative like ChatGPT at $20/mo is the more practical route.

Oleh KemOleh KemFounder & Lead Analyst
ComparEdge EditorialUpdated: July 8, 2026

Llama (Meta) price history


Price & Data Intelligence SyncLast verified: July 30, 2026 · CE-LLM-2026W31-4515F1 · No changes detected
Up to date

Cheaper Large Language Models tools


Frequently asked questions


Sources & verification

Verified by ComparEdgeMethod: Vendor docs, official pages, and selected independent sources
SourceWhat was checkedLast checked
Official WebsiteOfficial vendor website
G2G2 verified user reviews · 4.6/5 · 152 reviews
CapterraCapterra verified user reviews · 4.7/5
TrustRadiusTrustRadius verified reviews
PeerSpotPeerSpot enterprise peer reviews

Every fact on this Llama (Meta) pricing page is tied to a named source and a verification date. Freshness-sensitive figures trace to the sources above; verify against the vendor before relying on them.

Explore Llama (Meta)

Every page on Llama (Meta) in one place, you are on pricing.