Best Cisco Secure Endpoint Alternatives in 2026
Stick with Cisco Secure Endpoint if you need deep integration with the Cisco security ecosystem. Consider SentinelOne for a clearer endpoint-security package or Huntress for SMB-focused managed EDR.
Feature Overview: Top Cisco Secure Endpoint Alternatives
Cisco Secure Endpoint compared against all 8 endpoint security (xdr/edr) alternatives. Pricing, free plan availability, rating, and endpoint security (xdr/edr)-specific capabilities.
| Tool | Price | Free Plan | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
 | $6.75/mo | No | 4.5G2 |
 | $2.08/mo | No | 4.9G2 |
 | Pay-as-you-go | No | 4.9G2 |
 | Custom | No | 4.7G2 |
 | $7.99/mo | No | 4.6G2 |
 | Pay-as-you-go | No | 4.6G2 |
 | $9.17/mo | No | 4.7G2 |
 | Custom | No | 4.6G2 |
 | Custom | No | 4.3G2 |
How Does Cisco Secure Endpoint Compare to Alternatives?
Independently verified metrics. Sources: AV-TEST, MITRE ATT&CK evaluations, vendor docs. Verified 2026.
| Tool | Agent CPU% | Agent RAMMB | MTTDmin | MTTRmin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Endpoint (this) | - | - | - | - |
| Huntress | - | - | - | - |
| SentinelOne | 1 | 50 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Cynet | 0.5 | 60 | 1 | 1 |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 1 | 40 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Sophos | 1 | 100 | 2 | 1 |
| Fortinet | - | - | - | - |
When Should You Stick with Cisco Secure Endpoint?
Alternatives are not always the right move. Cisco Secure Endpoint remains strong in these scenarios.
- +Leverages Talos intelligence, one of the world's largest threat research teams.
- +Deep integration with Cisco network gear for unparalleled device context.
- +Unified XDR visibility via the included SecureX platform.
- +Orbital advanced search provides deep OS-level visibility using osquery.
- +Strong exploit prevention and behavioral protection against fileless malware.
- -Lacks native Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and device control features.
- -The user interface can be complex and less intuitive than competitors.
- -Full XDR capabilities require investment in the broader Cisco Secure portfolio.
- -Higher resource consumption (CPU/memory) on endpoints compared to some rivals.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Alternatives by Business Size
8 alternatives evaluated by features, pricing, and real-world use cases.
Expert Take
Cisco Secure Endpoint works well when deployed within an existing Cisco-heavy infrastructure to use unified SecureX visibility and Talos threat intelligence. The friction starts when endpoints experience severe performance slowdowns after four to five days of system uptime without a reboot, alongside frequent false positives. Before buying, compare vs CrowdStrike Falcon, which provides native device control and a more intuitive administrative interface.
Oleh KemFounder & Lead AnalystManaged security platform for MSPs with threat hunting, EDR, and 24/7 SOC coverage.. Rated 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +Highest G2/Capterra ratings in endpoint security (4.8/4.9)
- +Human-verified threats eliminate alert fatigue
- +Best value MDR for SMBs at $5/endpoint/mo
- +Built by hackers: deep adversary insight for SMB threat patterns
- +24/7 Human Threat Hunting
- +Managed EDR
- +Managed SIEM (SIEM Lite)
- −I would like to see an easier way to whitelist sites or to monitor some of the reporting that Huntress Managed EDR does.
- −We would love for Huntress Managed EDR to ingest logs from Microsoft Sentinel.
- −One downside of Huntress Managed EDR, compared to the CrowdStrike agent, is that it takes a longer time to push it out to all of o
Autonomous AI-driven endpoint protection, EDR, and XDR with behavioral AI threat detection.. Rated 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +Autonomous AI response without human intervention
- +Storyline attack correlation simplifies threat hunting
- +Consistently top-performing in MITRE ATT&CK evaluations
- −To improve SentinelOne, I would suggest adding a network detection and response capability.
- −There is a clear roadmap for improvements, including enhancing capabilities with AI and seamless functionality in an MSP model for
- −One area for improvement would be the self-healing nature of the agent.
Autonomous XDR platform for mid-market with bundled EDR, UEBA, network analytics, and 24/7 MDR.. Rated 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +24/7 MDR (CyOps) included: rare value at this price
- +All-in-one: EDR + network + UEBA + deception in one agent
- +High G2 rating (4.7) for XDR category
- +AutoRemedy reduces response time without SOC headcount
- −One area where Cynet needs improvement is tamper protection for Mac and Linux agents.
- −There are some issues, especially with the integrations.
- −Their deployment needs some work, especially with integration with remote monitoring management systems like Datto AutoTask or Con
Cloud-native endpoint protection, EDR, and XDR powered by CrowdStrike's Threat Graph and ML.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +Best-in-class threat intelligence from 29k+ customer sensor network
- +Falcon OverWatch managed threat hunting is industry-leading
- +Threat Graph processes 1T+ events/week for AI detection
- +Comprehensive XDR platform covering endpoint to cloud
- −The improvements needed for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security include reducing its high cost, which is currently quite expensive,
- −I recommend enhancing CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, particularly in the areas of vulnerability management and agent troublesh
- −In terms of improvement, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security could expand into the remediation path.
Network detection and response platform analyzing real-time traffic for threats, lateral movement, and anomalies.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +Best-in-class network detection and response (NDR)
- +Detects lateral movement that endpoint tools miss
- +Works on unmanaged devices (IoT, OT) without agents
- +CrowdStrike integration creates powerful XDR combination
- +Network Detection & Response (NDR)
- +ML-Based Behavioral Analytics
- +Full-Packet Capture
- +Encrypted Traffic Analysis
- −What they can improve would be building a broader reach in terms of capabilities.
- −We've had some struggles getting it to see everything that we want to see.
- −The solution could get more aggressive in the discounting of the overall cost.
A unified security platform for SMBs and mid-market, combining endpoint, firewall, and MDR managed from a single cloud c. Rated 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +Sophos Central provides a single pane of glass for endpoint, server, and firewall.
- +Synchronized Security links endpoints and firewalls for automated threat response.
- +Strong focus on MSPs with multi-tenant management and flexible billing.
- +Intercept X combines deep learning AI with anti-ransomware and exploit prevention.
- +Full-service MDR offering includes 24/7 threat hunting and complete remediation.
- −UTM/XG Firewall reporting can be less granular than dedicated network tools.
- −The platform's breadth can lead to a steeper learning curve for some modules.
- −Performance impact on older endpoints can be noticeable during intensive scans.
Enterprise network security platform with FortiGate NGFW, SD-WAN, SASE, endpoint, and cloud security.. Rated 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5 for Cisco Secure Endpoint.
- +680k+ customers: the network security market leader
- +Single-vendor Security Fabric simplifies architecture
- +FortiGuard Labs provides best-in-class threat intelligence
- +OT/IoT security is industry-leading
- +Next-Generation Firewall (FortiGate)
- +Endpoint Protection (FortiEDR)
- +SASE (FortiSASE)
- +SD-WAN
- −One drawback of Fortinet FortiGate is that they provide two types of models: one with a hard disk and another without.
- −We haven't tapped into most of the functionalities that Fortinet FortiGate offers because we're using it just for gateway security
- −From a support perspective, I had more issues that I didn't think the person on my case handled the way I was expecting.
XDR, endpoint, email, and network security platform formed from the McAfee/FireEye merger.. Cisco Secure Endpoint edges it on ratings (4.6 vs 4.4/5).
- +40k+ enterprise customers provide strong market credibility
- +Broad XDR coverage across endpoint, email, network, cloud
- +Helix SIEM/SOAR integration
- +FireEye legacy threat intelligence
- +XDR Platform (Trellix XDR)
- +Endpoint Security (ENS)
- +EDR
- −The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems.
- −For Trellix Active Response, there is room for improvement in the platform area and security area to make the dashboard visibility
- −I expected Active Response's user interface to be much more analytical.
Common Questions About Switching from Cisco Secure Endpoint
Sources & verification
| Source | What was checked | Last checked |
|---|---|---|
| Official Website | Official vendor website | — |
| G2 | G2 verified user reviews · 4.5/5 · 27 reviews | — |
| Capterra | Capterra verified user reviews · 4.2/5 | — |
| TrustRadius | TrustRadius verified reviews | — |
| PeerSpot | PeerSpot enterprise peer reviews | — |
Every fact on this Cisco Secure Endpoint pricing page is tied to a named source and a verification date. Freshness-sensitive figures trace to the sources above; verify against the vendor before relying on them.