Supabase vs Vultr

- ✦ PostgreSQL Database
- ✦ Authentication
- ✦ File Storage

- ✦ Cloud Compute
- ✦ Bare Metal
- ✦ Kubernetes
Supabase and Vultr are both Cloud Hosting tools. Supabase starts at $25/mo, Vultr at $1/mo. Compare features, pricing, and ratings below to find the best fit for your team.
When to Choose Supabase vs Vultr
The question that matters: “In what situation will I regret choosing A over B after 3 months?”
Supabase RLS policies enforce tenant data isolation at the database level, serving a single Postgres table to all customers without application-layer filtering code.
Supabase Realtime broadcasts Postgres table changes via WebSocket to subscribed clients, adding live collaboration or notification features without a separate message broker.
Supabase Auth integrates with Postgres RLS through the built-in auth.uid() function, wiring user identity to database row permissions without a separate identity service.
Deploy game servers on Bare Metal across 32 global locations for consistent sub-50ms tick rates, with Firewalls isolating game nodes from matchmaking services.
Vultr Kubernetes runs standard kubectl manifests with Managed Databases and Block Storage, keeping workloads portable and free from single-provider lock-in.
Pricing Comparison & PlansHigh· Verified Jul 2, 2026
Free
FreeBest for: Passion projects / simple sites
- ✓Up to 2 active projects
- ✓500MB database space
- ✓1GB file storage
- ✓50,000 monthly active users (MAU)
- ✓500MB upload limit
Pro
$25/moBest for: Production apps
- ✓8GB database space included
- ✓100GB file storage included
- ✓100,000 monthly active users (MAU)
- ✓Daily backups retained for 7 days
- ✓No project pausing
Block Storage
$1/moBest for: Scalable and persistent storage for your cloud instances
- ✓Attaches to compute instances for additional capacity
- ✓Beyond included SSD allocation
- ✓High-performance storage
Cloud Compute
$2.5/moBest for: Ideal for general purpose workloads and cost-effective cloud infrastructure
- ✓Easy-to-use, affordable VMs
- ✓For many common workloads
- ✓Billed hourly, capped at 672 hours/month
- ✓IPv6-only entry price
- ✓Global data centers
Object Storage
$5/moBest for: S3 compatible storage for unstructured data like backups, archives, and media files
- ✓S3-compatible storage
- ✓For backup and archival
- ✓Multiple performance tiers (Standard, Premium, Performance, Accelerated, Archival)
- ✓Per-TB + transfer billing
High Frequency Cloud Compute
$6/moBest for: CPU-intensive applications requiring faster processors and NVMe storage
- ✓Optimized for database workloads
- ✓Suitable for latency-sensitive applications
- ✓Billed on actual hours (730-hour average)
- ✓NVMe SSD storage
- ✓High-performance AMD CPUs
Capability Breakdown
9 differences found across 18 standardized features
- •PostgreSQL Database
- •Authentication
- •File Storage
- •Edge Functions
- •Realtime Subscriptions
- •Row Level Security
- •REST API Auto-generated
- •GraphQL
- •Database Backups
- •Connection Pooling
- •Vector/pgvector
- •Full Text Search
- •Dashboard
- •CLI
- •Self-Hosting
- •Cloud Compute
- •Bare Metal
- •Kubernetes
- •Managed Databases
- •Object Storage
- •Block Storage
- •Load Balancers
- •Firewalls
- •DNS
- •Snapshots
- •Backups
- •API
- •CLI
- •32 Global Locations
- •DDoS Protection
Strengths & Limitations
Evaluative strengths and weaknesses: not feature lists
- +Direct PostgreSQL access with full SQL and extension support
- +Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs from your database schema
- +Open source core allows for self-hosting and no vendor lock-in
- +Integrated row-level security (RLS) for fine-grained data access
- +Generous free tier includes two organizations and 500MB database
- −No built-in serverless functions for complex backend logic (requires Edge Functions)
- −Realtime server is single-region, potentially increasing latency for global users
- −Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with PostgreSQL and RLS
- −Managed platform lacks some advanced Postgres configurations (e.g., pgbouncer)
- −Cloud Functions are Deno-based, which has a smaller ecosystem than Node.js
- +Extensive global footprint with 32 low-latency data centers
- +Hourly billing and per-second billing for Bare Metal instances
- +High-performance NVMe SSD storage standard on all compute plans
- +One-click deployment for popular apps like WordPress and cPanel
- +Offers both high-performance virtual machines and dedicated bare metal
- −Support is primarily ticket-based; phone support costs extra
- −Fewer managed services (e.g., databases, serverless) than AWS/GCP
- −Network overage charges can be expensive and unpredictable
- −DDoS protection is a paid add-on, not included by default
- −The user interface is less polished than some larger competitors
At a Glance
Recent Price History
Vultr removed the "Optimized Cloud Compute (Dedicated CPU)" plan
Plan removed · May 30, 2026
Vultr removed the "High Performance (Shared CPU)" plan
Plan removed · May 30, 2026
Vultr removed the "Cloud Compute (Shared CPU)" plan
Plan removed · May 30, 2026
Vultr added a new "DDoS Protection" plan at $10/mo
Plan added · May 30, 2026
Vultr added a new "Load Balancers" plan at $10/mo
Plan added · May 30, 2026
Supabase added a new "Enterprise" plan
Plan added · May 21, 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Sources & Data Trail · Supabase
- 1.Official Pricing Page·Source of verified tiers(Checked: 2026-07-02)
- 2.Official Website·Official vendor website
- 3.G2·G2 verified reviews · 4.7/5 · 47 reviews
- 4.TrustRadius·TrustRadius verified reviews
- 5.PeerSpot·PeerSpot enterprise peer reviews
Sources & Data Trail · Vultr
- 1.Official Pricing Page·Source of verified tiers(Checked: 2026-07-02)
- 2.Official Website·Official vendor website
- 3.G2·G2 verified reviews · 4.4/5 · 285 reviews
- 4.Capterra·Capterra verified reviews · 4.5/5
- 5.TrustRadius·TrustRadius verified reviews
