Updated May 13, 2026 · Independent Analysis

★ 4.4/5-0.2 vs PostgreSQL
Only in CockroachDB
- ✦ Distributed SQL
- ✦ PostgreSQL Wire Protocol
- ✦ Multi-Region Replication
✓ Free plan1k+ users · est. 2015

★ 4.6/5+0.2 vs CockroachDB
Only in PostgreSQL
- ✦ Advanced SQL
- ✦ JSON/JSONB Support
- ✦ Full-Text Search
✓ Free planMost popular users · est. 1996
Pricing Intelligence

CockroachDB Plans
Free tier available
- • 10 GiB storage
- • Shared cluster
- • PostgreSQL compatible
- • $0.20/hr
- • Dedicated cluster
- • Multi-region support
- • Custom deployment
- • SLA
- • HIPAA/FedRAMP
Full CockroachDB Pricing Breakdown →Feature Matrix
3 differences found across 10 standardized features
Feature
CockroachDB
PostgreSQL
Pros & Cons Face-Off
Evaluative strengths and weaknesses — not feature lists
Pros
- +PostgreSQL compatibility minimizes migration effort
- +Survives node and zone failures automatically
- +Global multi-region with low-latency reads via follower reads
- +Free tier for development and small workloads
Cons
- −More expensive than single-node PostgreSQL for simple use cases
- −Distributed transaction overhead vs single-node performance
Pros
- +#1 most-loved database — massive community and ecosystem
- +Rich extensions (pgvector, PostGIS, TimescaleDB)
- +Zero licensing cost with enterprise-grade features
- +Available managed on all major clouds
Cons
- −Horizontal write scaling requires external solutions (Citus)
- −Large cluster operations require database expertise
At a Glance
Starting PriceFree tiervsPay-per-use
Feature Count16 featuresvs16 features
Frequently Asked Questions