Updated May 13, 2026 · Independent Analysis

★ 4.5/5+0.1 vs CockroachDB
Only in Redis
- ✦ In-Memory Storage
- ✦ Persistent Storage (RDB/AOF)
- ✦ Pub/Sub Messaging
✓ Free planFrom $7/mo10M+ users · est. 2009
Only in CockroachDB
- ✦ Distributed SQL
- ✦ PostgreSQL Wire Protocol
- ✦ Multi-Region Replication
✓ Free plan1k+ users · est. 2015
Pricing Intelligence

Redis Plans
Free tier available
- • Full Redis
- • RSAL license
- • Community support
Redis CloudBest Value
$7/mo- • Managed Redis
- • Free 30MB tier
- • 99.999% SLA
Full Redis Pricing Breakdown →
CockroachDB Plans
Free tier available
- • 10 GiB storage
- • Shared cluster
- • PostgreSQL compatible
- • $0.20/hr
- • Dedicated cluster
- • Multi-region support
- • Custom deployment
- • SLA
- • HIPAA/FedRAMP
Full CockroachDB Pricing Breakdown →Feature Matrix
6 differences found across 10 standardized features
Pros & Cons Face-Off
Evaluative strengths and weaknesses — not feature lists
Pros
- +Sub-millisecond latency — fastest data store for caching
- +Universal — supported by every framework and language
- +Rich data structures for real-time use cases
- +Redis Stack adds search, JSON, and vector capabilities
Cons
- −License changed to RSAL — Valkey is the open-source BSD fork
- −In-memory storage makes large datasets expensive
Pros
- +PostgreSQL compatibility minimizes migration effort
- +Survives node and zone failures automatically
- +Global multi-region with low-latency reads via follower reads
- +Free tier for development and small workloads
Cons
- −More expensive than single-node PostgreSQL for simple use cases
- −Distributed transaction overhead vs single-node performance
At a Glance
Starting Price$7/movsFree tier
Feature Count16 featuresvs16 features
Frequently Asked Questions