ComparEdge
Homeai-codingCompareAugment Code vs Windsurf
Updated May 13, 2026 · Independent Analysis

Augment CodevsWindsurf

Capability Overview
Augment Code logo - software comparison
Augment Codevs Windsurf
4.6/5
Only in Augment Code
  • Deep Codebase Indexing
  • AI Chat
  • Code Completion
From $30/mo(pricier)50k+ developers users · est. 2022
Windsurf logo - software comparison
Windsurfvs Augment Code
4.6/5
Only in Windsurf
  • Cascade AI agent
  • Full codebase indexing
  • Multi-file editing
✓ Free planFrom $20/mo(cheaper)200K+ users · est. 2024

Real-World Scenarios: When to Choose Which

The question that matters: “In what situation will I regret choosing A over B after 3 months?”

Windsurf Unique Strength
Build and Test Features in One Window

Cascade monitors terminal output and proposes fixes automatically - compressing feature validation from 40 minutes to 12 minutes per iteration.

→ Choose Windsurf if this scenario applies to you. Augment Code doesn't offer a comparable solution.
Windsurf Unique Strength
Turn Failing Tests Into Passing Code Fast

Cascade reads assertion errors, inspects related files through multi-file editing, and generates corrected code - often passing on the very first re-run.

→ Choose Windsurf if this scenario applies to you. Augment Code doesn't offer a comparable solution.

Pricing Intelligence

Windsurf saves you $10/user/movs Augment Code
Augment Code logo - software comparison

Augment Code Plans

Paid plans only

IndividualBest Value
$30/user/mo
  • Unlimited completions
  • Deep context
  • VS Code + JetBrains
Team
Custom
  • Team codebase
  • Shared context
  • Admin controls
Full Augment Code Pricing Breakdown →
Windsurf logo - software comparison

Windsurf Plans

Free tier available

Free0
Free

You get Unlimited inline edits, Unlimited Tab completions, Light agent quota. What's locked behind the paywall: increased quotas, openai, claude, gemini access, full model availability. If those matter, Pro at $20/mo is the next step. Good enough for solo use and evaluation.

ProBest Value
$20/mo

$20/mo gets you Increased quotas, OpenAI, Claude, Gemini access, Full model availability. The sweet spot for professionals who've maxed out the free plan and need Increased quotas, OpenAI, Claude, Gemini access.

Teams
$40/user/mo

$40/user/mo gets you Everything in Pro, Team management. Team of 5 = $200/mo, team of 10 = $400/mo. 100% more than Pro - justified only if you need the extras.

Enterprise
Custom

Custom pricing for SSO, Custom deployment. Always negotiate - ask for pilot pricing if testing with <50 seats, and push for annual discount commitments. Compare enterprise quotes against Cursor's equivalent tier.

Full Windsurf Pricing Breakdown →

Feature Matrix

21 differences found across 32 standardized features

Feature
Augment Code
Windsurf
Autocomplete
Chat
Multi-file Edits
Debug Assist
VS Code
JetBrains
GitHub Copilot Alt
Text Generation
Code Generation
Code Completion
Bug Detection
Free Tier
Multi-language
IDE Integration
Chat Interface
Refactoring
CLI Tools
PR Integration
Codebase Context
Custom Models
Enterprise Plans
Total (raw)
15
20

Pros & Cons Face-Off

Evaluative strengths and weaknesses — not feature lists

Pros
  • +Best deep codebase understanding
  • +Excellent for large enterprise codebases
  • +Strong privacy and security controls
  • +Works with both VS Code and JetBrains
Cons
  • More expensive than GitHub Copilot
  • Less known than competitors
  • Overkill for small projects
Pros
  • +Most generous free tier of any AI IDE
  • +Cascade agent rivals Cursor Composer
  • +No usage limit on completions
  • +Strong VS Code compatibility
  • +$15/mo vs Cursor's $20/mo
Cons
  • Smaller community than Cursor
  • Fewer model choices than Cursor

At a Glance

User Rating
4.6/5vs4.6/5
Augment Code
Windsurf
Starting Price
$30/movs$20/mo
Augment Code
Windsurf
Feature Count
15 featuresvs20 features
Augment Code
Windsurf
User Base
50vs200K
Augment Code
Windsurf

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons

Authored by Oleh Kem·Reviewed by Oleh KemExpert verified·Updated May 13, 2026·Our methodology