Augment CodevsTabnine
- ✦ Deep Codebase Indexing
- ✦ AI Chat
- ✦ Code Completion
- ✦ AI code completion
- ✦ Chat assistant
- ✦ Private code models
Real-World Scenarios: When to Choose Which
The question that matters: “In what situation will I regret choosing A over B after 3 months?”
Train Private code models on internal repos so completions match your proprietary architecture. Code review cycles drop 40% from reduced framework mismatches.
Local/cloud models run entirely on-premise at sub-200ms latency. Zero code snippets leave the network - meets HIPAA and FedRAMP data retention requirements.
Pricing Intelligence
Augment Code Plans
Paid plans only
- • Unlimited completions
- • Deep context
- • VS Code + JetBrains
- • Team codebase
- • Shared context
- • Admin controls
Tabnine Plans
Free tier available
You get Basic completions, VS Code + JetBrains, Limited suggestions. What's locked behind the paywall: full completions, chat assistant, all ides. If those matter, Pro at $12/mo is the next step. Good enough for solo use and evaluation.
$12/mo gets you Full completions, Chat assistant, All IDEs. The sweet spot for professionals who've maxed out the free plan and need Full completions, Chat assistant.
$39/mo gets you Private models, Self-hosted, Zero data retention. 225% more than Pro - justified only if you need the extras.
Feature Matrix
20 differences found across 35 standardized features
Pros & Cons Face-Off
Evaluative strengths and weaknesses — not feature lists
- +Best deep codebase understanding
- +Excellent for large enterprise codebases
- +Strong privacy and security controls
- +Works with both VS Code and JetBrains
- −More expensive than GitHub Copilot
- −Less known than competitors
- −Overkill for small projects
- +Free plan available
- +Large user base (1M+)
- −User ratings could be higher
- −AI output quality varies by use case