

The question that matters: “In what situation will I regret choosing A over B after 3 months?”
Generate correct CDK stacks with proper IAM policies, VPC configurations, and resource references in seconds
Automatically upgrade Java 8/11 application codebases to Java 17/21 using the code transformation agent
Scan Lambda function code for security issues and receive inline fix suggestions without leaving VS Code
Generate and explain CloudFormation templates for complex multi-service architectures with correct resource dependencies
Cascade AI agent identifies all touch points, applies changes in dependency order, and Terminal integration runs tests between edits. Review cycles drop from 2 weeks to 3 days.
One orchestrated sequence generates API endpoints, database migrations, integration tests, and API docs. Naming conventions and architecture patterns stay consistent across all.
Multi-file editing applies version and API compatibility changes across repositories in one operation. Codebase awareness prevents orphaned imports that cause post-deploy.
Supercomplete with deep context generates boilerplate following project standards. New engineers submit pull requests that pass senior review on first attempt.
You get Unlimited inline edits, Unlimited Tab completions, Light agent quota. What's locked behind the paywall: increased quotas, openai, claude, gemini access, full model availability. If those matter, Pro at $20/mo is the next step. Good enough for solo use and evaluation.
$20/mo gets you Increased quotas, OpenAI, Claude, Gemini access, Full model availability, 2-week free trial. The sweet spot for professionals who've maxed out the free plan and need Increased quotas, OpenAI, Claude, Gemini access.
$40/user/mo gets you Everything in Pro, Team management, Centralized billing. Team of 5 = $200/mo, team of 10 = $400/mo. 100% more than Pro - justified only if you need the extras.
Custom pricing for SSO, Custom deployment. Always negotiate - ask for pilot pricing if testing with <50 seats, and push for annual discount commitments. Compare enterprise quotes against Cursor's equivalent tier.
13 differences found across 29 standardized features
Evaluative strengths and weaknesses — not feature lists